It’s perhaps a little too much to say that Leo XIV’s pontificate began on the Iberian Peninsula, but his recent six-day sojourn in Spain was a clear sign of the kind of pontificate to expect from him.

It will be a pontificate that looks to the peripheries of the faith, as Pope Francis did throughout his own. The difference lies in how we understand these peripheries.

During his twelve-year reign, Pope Francis carefully avoided countries with the most ancient Christian traditions. He never made an apostolic visit to France, preferring to go to Strasbourg in 2014 without even stopping by the cathedral, which was celebrating its thousandth anniversary, and then making a last-ditch effort to visit Corsica without passing through Paris.

Spain, too, had not been a favorite destination for the pope. The only plan that could materialize was a stop in the Canary Islands during his final (never-fulfilled) journey to Argentina, to provide relief to migrants stranded on the Atlantic islands. A stop in Madrid was, in any case, out of the question, much less Barcelona, even though he was expected in Manresa to celebrate the feast of Saint Ignatius of Loyola.

In Europe, Pope Francis had sought out countries where the Catholic tradition was a minority, with a few exceptions: Lithuania, included in a Baltic tour that saw him visit Protestant Latvia and agnostic Estonia; and Poland, a mandatory stop for World Youth Day. Otherwise, Francis mostly visited countries with non-Catholic majorities, both in Europe and around the world.

Leo XIV has turned that on its head.

The first countries he has chosen to visit in Europe on his international travels are those with a solid Catholic history. Monaco, first and foremost, is also a sign of concern for small countries, demonstrating that the Holy See looks to all states, and that indeed all states have an impact on the Society of Nations.

There was the recent trip to Spain. Soon he will go to San Marino, technically an “international” voyage even though it will not take him off the Italian peninsula, a journey similar to the one that brought him to Monaco. Then, he will be in France, where he will not only visit the reopened Notre Dame but will also travel as far as Metz, in those border territories where the Napoleonic Concordat is still in force.

Everything suggests that for Leo XIV, the new evangelization is the primary theme.

These are all places previously considered the center of faith, with France often called la fille aînée de l’église – the “eldest daughter of the Church” – each with an an ancient Catholicism of late caught in fascination with advanced secularism.

These are peculiar peripheries, though. In France, especially, there has been a return of faith inexplicable to everyone, which has led to an increase in adult baptisms over the last five years.

Leo XIV thus made his task clear: to confirm in the faith. And where to confirm if not from the nations that have maintained a Christian identity and heritage, but seem to have lost it?

The trip to Spain was a clear example of this. The pope’s presence reawakened faith like no one would have imagined. The 1.2 million people gathered in Plaza Cibeles in Madrid spoke volumes about the country’s profound Catholicism better than any speech.

The emotion of the people of Barcelona at the blessing of the Tower of Jesus of the Sagrada Familia was tangible. Also in Barcelona, the pope visited the monastery of Montserrat, where the inscription reads: “Catalonia will be Christian or it will not be.”

The presence of a pope was needed to remind the Spanish people of their faith.

Leo XIV was at the Cortes, the Spanish parliament, where he read a monumental speech before all members of parliament. Even members from the populist Podemos Party showed up at the chamber, though having strongly criticized the decision to invite the pope in the first place.

In a powerful speech, the pope spoke out against populism and nationalism, but also against abortion and for human life, addressing critical issues facing all political factions, without exception.

Above all, the pope reminded Spain of the cultural legacy the nation has given the world, beginning with the School of Salamanca, the thought of the brilliant Dominicans who studied the rights of the peoples of the New World, laying the foundations for what would become human rights.

In his speech to the diplomatic corps, Leo XIV recalled two other Spanish saints, Saint John of the Cross and Saint Teresa of Avila, urging them to build the State according to Christian principles, maintaining a healthy secularism, and at the same time not excluding religion from public life.

The speech to the Cortes drew a full eight minutes of applause, an enormous amount in a chamber with a socialist and generally anticlerical majority.

But that’s what the pope’s presence is for.

It serves to remind us that when we appeal to certain fundamental principles, we do so starting from a thought, that of the Church, which remains at the root of all reasoning. It serves to remind people of their Christianity, somewhat dormant because it lacks the necessary shock that only the pope’s presence can provide.

This is what the pope’s presence is for: to make faith alive and present, to bring it out of the catacombs of thought, to restore Christ to the center even on the peripheries of faith.

The trip to France will likely be met with the same enthusiasm, but one can imagine the pope also visiting England, Germany, perhaps Austria, and Croatia in the coming years, in an ideal tour to the heart of the European faith, from which to relaunch the great European discourse.

In Spain, there will be a before-and-after the pope’s trip. But there will likely be a before-and-after during his pontificate as well. Because Leo XIV unveiled his major themes and highlighted his objectives. And he did so in a journey marked by joy and emotion, both on the part of the pope and of those who attended.

We need the pope to confirm us in the faith.

It’s a simple truth and a primary purpose of the Petrine office in the Church, after all, and Leo XIV just leaned way into it.

 

One Response to Leo XIV: On the peripheries of faith

  1. James Scott scrive:

    ‘We need the pope to confirm us in the faith.

    It’s a simple truth and a primary purpose of the Petrine office in the Church…’

    Since 1965 (if not before) the Church in Europe has been in freefall.

    Despite which, the late Pope Francis [Bishop of Rome 2013-2025]:
    ‘[went] to Strasbourg in 2014 without even stopping by the cathedral which was celebrating its thousandth anniversary…had sought out countries where the Catholic tradition was a minority, with a few exceptions: Lithuania, included in a Baltic tour that saw him visit Protestant Latvia and agnostic Estonia; and Poland, a mandatory stop for World Youth Day. Otherwise, Francis mostly visited countries with non-Catholic majorities, both in Europe and around the world.’

    That without mentioning that:

    Pope Francis’ Apostolic Journey [to Mongolia; a distance of 7 000+ kms as the crow flies] was highly notable as it marked the first-ever papal visit to the country, bringing global attention to one of the world’s smallest Catholic communities numbering just about 1,450 faithful!

    However, I do recall reading some 5 or 6 weeks ago that somebody in the Vatican, a cardinal perhaps, has noticed that the pews of Europe (and now North America too) are glaringly empty and has suggested that “maybe we should react to this ” or similar.

    Now Leo XIV has visited Monaco, has just visited Spain and plans to visit France very shortly. Bby this account in Spain he struck a nerve of historic Catholicism which has been hidden from view till his arrival. Would that I could agree.

    The online Spanish financial website Articulo14 stated in a report dated 3rd June that 14 of the 35 biggest companies on the Spanish stock market had signed up as sponsors of the Papal trip, to the tune of 40+% of the outgoings. My distant, rusty and rudimentary Latin includes ‘Cuius regio, eius religio’ which is more readily expressed in English (in stock market rather than in religious language) as ‘whoever pays the piper calls the tune.’

    The single most consistent and persistent theme of this papal trip, which is not alluded to even once in this report was Pope Leo’s continued almost unqualified support for a de facto open borders policy; precisely the call for more cheap labour for the Spanish economy which is a common cry both of companies on the Spanish stock market and of the PSOE government. Which latter also contributed very substantially to the costs of the visit; both in kind and, not least, in ordering the always subservient state broadcasting bodies to give maximum coverage to the trip.

    The statement above that ‘ the pope spoke out against populism and nationalism, but also against abortion and for human life…’ is open to question .

    Whilst true that Leo alluded both to abortion and to euthanasia in the Congress it is, in my opinion, important to highlight that neither, highly controversial and as such divisive in Spain as in so many ‘progressive’ countries, word actually passed the lips of the pontiff.

    Strange?

    Sadly I must concur with a Spanish tweet I read which stated, in translation:

    The Pope as a mass phenomenon, is not a sign of latent religiosity but rather is it a sign of pop-culture

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato.

È possibile utilizzare questi tag ed attributi XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>