<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MondayVatican &#187; MondayVatican &#8211; Green Pope » After the Castro&#8217;s interview with the Pope, what will be the future of Cuba?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mondayvatican.com/tag/green-pope/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com</link>
	<description>Vatican at a Glance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 23:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>After the Castro&#8217;s interview with the Pope, what will be the future of Cuba?</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/after-the-castros-interview-with-the-pope-what-will-be-the-future-of-cuba</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/after-the-castros-interview-with-the-pope-what-will-be-the-future-of-cuba#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelo Becciu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archdiocese of Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernardin Gantin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birkenau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloqueo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ's Nativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological quest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el amor todo lo espera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enrique Lopez Oliva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frei Betto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Granma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helms-Burton Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaime Ortega y Alamino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paul II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la religion en cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberation Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lìder màximo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Theresa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostpolitik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papal diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raul Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reconciliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renato Raffaele Martino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Etchegaray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tarcisio Bertone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgen del Cobre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall of Berlin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/b16fidel.jpg"></a>In the living room of the cardinal Roger Etchegaray’s house in Rome a Cuban Christ&#8217;s Nativity is exposed since more than 20 years. The Christ’s  Nativity is a present Fidel Castro made to him during one of their meeting, between the end of 80s and the beginning of 90s. Roger Etchegaray <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1989-01-21/local/me-910_1_roman-catholic-church">first met [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/b16fidel.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-916" title="b16fidel" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/b16fidel-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In the living room of the cardinal Roger Etchegaray’s house in Rome a Cuban Christ&#8217;s Nativity is exposed since more than 20 years. The Christ’s  Nativity is a present Fidel Castro made to him during one of their meeting, between the end of 80s and the beginning of 90s. Roger Etchegaray <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1989-01-21/local/me-910_1_roman-catholic-church">first met the <em>lìder màximo </em>in 1989</a>: the cardinal was still president of the <a href="http://www.justpax.it/">Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace</a>, and went secretly to Cuba to strengthen the relationships between Cuba and the Holy See. Cuba was beginning to open up to world, but the world was still not open to Cuba.</p>
<p>Benedict XVI came to visit Cuba the last week, and many things of changed. Fidel is not governing any more, and the new <em>lìder </em>is his brother Raul.  Fidel Castro is now a more than 80 years old private citizen, and he is living the end of his life writing and thinking. Yet in 1989, Fidel Castro explained to Etchegaray that his «reference points» were <em>The Capital</em> by Karl Marx and the Gospel. It was not surprising. Just a few remember that Castro – a self proclaimed atheist – <a href="http://goodjesuitbadjesuit.blogspot.it/2007/12/fidel-castro-jesuit-educated.html">studied in a Jesuit school</a>. Fidel Castro considers  his <em>revoluciòn</em> as a deeply religious fact – and maybe this view has been influenced by Frei Betto, a radical priest, Liberation theologian, who talked several times with Castro during the 80s. Now, Fidel Castro is a different man: he is not imprisoned by his myth anymore. Now he can be who he truly is: a man that is searching for the sense of life.</p>
<p><strong>The meeting with Benedict XVI </strong></p>
<p>March, 28<sup>th</sup> 2012. At around noon and a half, a white car parks in the front of the Holy See Nuntiature to Cuba. Fidel Castro <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/attivita-del-papa/2-il-papa/2339-fidel-castro-prende-il-caffe-con-il-papa.html">went to visit the Pope</a>, accompanied by his restricted convoy staff, his wife and his two sons. Right in time for the after lunch coffee – he and the Pope drank it during their private meeting. Castro is welcomed by cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Vatican Secretary of State. Bertone and Castro already knew each other. Bertone <a href="http://www.ilportonedibronzo.it/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=215:cuba-attende-il-papa&amp;catid=1:ultime&amp;Itemid=50">went to Cuba in 2008</a>, to celebrate the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the memorable visit to Cuba of John Paul II. And he came back to Rome with the Fidel’s invitation to the Pope in his pockets. Before, in 2006 Renato Raffaele Martino went to Cuba to present the Compendium for the Social Doctrine of the Church, met Fidel Castro and got from him an invitation for John Paul II. And even msgr. Angelo Becciu, Substitute (number 2) of the Vatican Secretary of State got invitation for the Pope when he was at his previous post of Papal nuncio to Cuba.</p>
<p>Some years have passed by before those invitations could become real. In the meantime, Fidel Castro fell sick, transferred all of his powers to his brother Raul, chose to retire. It is not time for rallies anymore, and Fidel makes his (few) political proclaims to his <em>reflecciones</em> published on the web-site <a href="http://www.cubadebate.cu/"><em>Cuba Debate</em></a>. For Fidel, it is time to think. On his bedside table, Fidel still has <em>The Capital</em> by Karl Marx and <em>The Origin of the Species</em> by Charles Darwin. But – someone close to him confess – he often meditate the Gospel, that he knows since the Jesuits school’s time. «I could go to school, to Jesuit school – Castro <a href="http://www.libertaepersona.org/wordpress/2012/03/fidel-castro-e-la-chiesa/">once explained</a> – because the priests did not have an income. They just got food and shelter and they lived in austerity. Austere, serious, ready to sacrifice and hardworking, Jesuits served for free, and this is how they cut the outcomes». More: «The spirit  of sacrifice and the austerity of Jesuits, their way of living, their work and their commitment made the school accessible for a very cheap price. All of those Jesuits were politically right-oriented.  Some of them were obviously generous and they express their solidarity to other people. Under certain aspects, they were irreprehensible». Yet, they «appreciated good attitudes, the correctness, the honesty, the courage, the skill to the sacrifice». But «I – Castro concluded – never really had a religious conviction or a religious faith. No-one was able to instill it to it. I instead have a political faith that makes me a trusted and optimist man». This anecdote tells how much Church is – and has always been – important in Cuba.</p>
<p>The Church is so important in Cuba that Raul Castro &#8211; that is driving Cuba through a difficult transition – had <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/attivita-del-papa/2-il-papa/2336-il-papa-e-raul-castro-a-colloquio-per-45-minuti.html">a 40 minutes private meeting</a> with Benedict XVI and wanted to be with the Pope in every moment: he welcomed the Pope – and it was not previewed &#8211; also at the airport of La Habana.</p>
<p>When the Pope landed at Santiago de Cuba, Raul <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/the-pope/9168532/Pope-arrives-in-Cuba-to-a-greeting-from-Raul-Castro.html">held a long speech</a> – a sort of rally – speaking about the difficulties of Cuba, especially because of the <em>bloqueo</em>, the U.S. embargo to Cuba. In fact, there is a way out of the embargo: the importation from the United States (especially raw materials) goes from the U.S. to Cuba through military channels, and even the paper on which the newspaper of the regime <em>Granma </em>is printed comes from the United States.</p>
<p>Fidel Castro did not want that his meeting with the Pope could be charged with a political meaning. He is not the <em>lìder màximo</em>, now. He is spending is old age reading and studying. More than all, he is now looking for truth. And who is the best person to talk with, if not the Pope that always talks about truth?</p>
<p><strong>Interview with the Pope </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Fidel Castro arrives at the Nunciature after lunch, and after the Mass the Pope held in <em>Plaza de la Revoluciòn</em>. There, the Pope <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/attivita-del-papa/2-il-papa/2338-la-messa-del-papa-in-plaza-de-la-revolucion-la-chiesa-deve-contare-sulla-liberta-religiosa.html">pronounced</a> 20 times the word «truth» and 12 times the word «freedom», which are – the Pope <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/homilies/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_hom_20120328_la-habana_en.html">explains</a> – linked and indispensible the one with the other, and that are expression of an only reality that is realized in Christ, the only one that «show us the truth and give us genuine freedom The truth is a desire of the human person, the search for which always supposes the exercise of authentic freedom».</p>
<p>Here they are, having coffee together. On one side, Fidel, making questions. On the other side, Benedict XVI, giving answers. «What does a Pope do?», Fidel Castro asks. «He serves the universal Church», Benedict XVI replies. Castro thanked the Pope for the beatifications of Mother Theresa, benefactor of Cuba – he was very grateful to her – and John Paul II, the first Pope who visited Cuba.</p>
<p>If Fidel Castro is a man full of questions, Benedict XVI seems to have all the answers: his faith is feed with reason, the word becomes Word. And this Word is edgy like sword. «Cuba made some steps forward», Benedict XVI said during the Mass in the morning. But – he added then – this is not sufficient.</p>
<p>During the private meeting, Fidel Castro also asked about the current difficulties of humanity (recently, Fidel Castro became <a href="http://www.ilfoglio.it/soloqui/12790">interested on the ecological quest</a>, and the <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto">«Green Pope»</a> – as Benedict XVI has been defined – seems to be the best interlocutor), and he underlined «the difficulties of Science to respond to the current questions of the humanity». These are the topical issues of the Benedict XVI’s magisterium. And so the Pope explains the problem of the absence of God and its consequences, and speaks about the relationship between faith and reason. Fidel Castro is curious. «His Holiness – he asks – would you send me some books to flesh out what you just said to be?» «I must think the proper books to send you», the Pope answers.</p>
<p><strong>The past Fidel </strong></p>
<p>Fidel Castro is now searching for something beyond reality. Yet, he is the one that more than any other <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Cuba#Religious_freedom">tried to eradicate</a> Christianity from his country. After the <em>revoluciòn</em>, religious activities and proselytism were limited, and – since 1961 – the ecclesiastical goods were confiscated without any compensation, and hundreds of foreigner member of the clergy were expelled from the island. In Cuba, there was State atheism until 1992. Then, the turning: the <a href="http://www.cubanet.org/ref/dis/const_92_e.htm">Cuban constitution </a>of 1992 pledge religious freedom (art. 55). In fact, more than religious freedom, it is a sort of freedom of worship. Only after the John Paul II visit’s they who attend Masses are not considered suspicious, the Christmas day is considered a national holiday – and after Benedict XVI’s visits the Good Friday <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/component/content/article/29-le-opinioni/2353-la-pasqua-di-cuba.html">has become a national Holyday in Cuba</a> – and some religious groups obtained the permission to import religious materials and to meet leader of their religion. This is also a sign of the diplomatic impact of the Catholic Church. For example, the John Paul II’s visit to Cuba opened to the concession to the Jewish community in Cuba to publicly celebrate their rights and to import religious material and kosher food for their Pesach (Easter).</p>
<p><strong>The diplomatic impact of the Church in Cuba</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>But there is a long story about the diplomatic impact of Catholic Church in Cuban affairs. Christmas 1989: the wall of Berlin just fell down, and cardinal Roger Etchegaray, then president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, is in Cuba. His mission? Bridging. Cardinal Roger Etchegaray – at the end of his mission, at the end of the New Year’s Mass &#8211; posed a crowd-pleasing question: «What message shall I take to the Pope?» «That he come! That he come! That he come!» thousands of voices roared in unison. «I hear your message &#8211; replied Etchegaray &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what he will say, but I am certain he will come». Etchegaray&#8217;s nine-day Cuban tour was capped by an intimate meeting with Castro during Christmas week, underscored an easing of tensions between church and state in the officially atheist country, where practicing Christians and Jews have been objects of government repression for almost 30 years.</p>
<p>Castro made no secret of his eagerness to welcome the pontiff, partly because a visit would burnish his fading international image and partly because he believed John Paul sees eye to eye with him on many of the world&#8217;s secular problems, such as disarmament and Third World debt and poverty.</p>
<p>Despite longstanding diplomatic relations between Havana and the Vatican, John Paul II was cautious, waiting for positive steps toward religious freedom by the Cuban government before committing himself. Castro&#8217;s steps toward detente with Catholics, Protestants and Jews in Cuba were mostly small but significant, wrote Enrique Lopez Oliva, a professor of religion and history at Havana University who was then permitted to circulate the country&#8217;s only independent publication, a twice-monthly newsletter, <a href="http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=65729"><em>La Religion en Cuba</em></a>. But, however it  appeared, government tolerance of Lopez&#8217;s newsletter was relatively risk-free for the Castro regime. The copier-produced publication had a circulation of only 30 each issue and only 12 paid subscribers, all of them foreign journalists or embassies. Not all government steps toward better church-state relations have been such small ones, however. In a sharp turnabout from 1962, the government allowed in 1988 30 foreign priests to join the 210 native priests already working in Cuba. About 30 foreign nuns also arrived, and the Cuban leader was quoted as describing the nuns already working in Cuban hospitals and mental hospitals as «models for Communists».</p>
<p>Cuba&#8217;s relaxation of official restrictions on religion began with the unusual publication of a book-length series of interviews conducted with Castro in 1985 by Carlos Alberto Christo, a radical Brazilian priest who calls himself Father Betto.</p>
<p><strong><em>El bloqueo</em></strong><strong>, the Church and Papal Diplomacy</strong></p>
<p>Cuba, 1996. Just some days before sending its foreign minister to Havana, the <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-10-20/news/9610200210_1_archbishop-jean-louis-tauran-helms-burton-law-vatican-radio">Vatican issued</a> its first public attack on the principal U.S. law intended to isolate Cuba. The <a href="http://www.coha.org/helms-burton-act-resurrecting-the-iron-curtain/">Helms-Burton act</a>, which President Clinton signed in March after Cuba&#8217;s communist government shot down two U.S. civilian planes piloted by Cuban-Americans, allows Americans to sue foreign firms for using property seized from them after Cuba&#8217;s 1959 revolution. It also bans executives of suspect companies from entering the U.S.</p>
<p>Cardinal Roger Etchegaray called some provisions of the Helms-Burton Act «legally questionable» and noted that Cuba&#8217;s Roman Catholic bishops have spoken out against the legislation and told that Helms-Burton not only has drawn criticism in Latin America but from «the Western allies of the United States».</p>
<p>In the mean time, John Paul II decided to be directly involved in the Cuban affairs. Active, but mostly secret, diplomacy: this was the John Paul II’s<em> modus operandi</em>, a sort of revival of the <em>Ostpolitik</em> of the last Eighties, when the Pope had a topical rule in the transition of the Eastern Countries from Communism to Democracy.  And so, John Paul II acted in the way he acted with Poland, his native country: he asked to preach his political message of reconciliation among «all the Cubans» living in Cuba and in foreign countries; at the same time, he began a dialogue with Castro; and then, he auspicated the establishment of a diplomatic and political dialogue between Washington and Havana to favor a pacific transition in the island, when the time would come; above all, the pontiff auspicated the end of the American embargo in Cuba.</p>
<p>This was the climate, when the first steps for the historic John Paul II’s visit to Cuba are taking place. This secret diplomatic process had been set by the same John Paul II at the beginning of Nineties and developed through a series of high level meetings between Holy See and Castro’s officials.  Soviet Union had been for thirty years the main supplier of economic aids to Cuba: its collapse brought to a fall of Cuban economy and of the Cuban standard way of living – albeit this was low even during the best years of the Communist era. In the midst of this scenario, the Pope tought that the time had come to make some more step forward.</p>
<p>So, the 12<sup>th</sup> of July 1994, Bernardin Gantin, then Prefect of the Congregation of Bishops and President of the Pontifical Commission for the Central America, had <a href="http://www.zenit.org/article-29683?l=italian">a private meeting</a> with Fidel Castro in the Holy See Nunciature in Cuba. Then, Castro spent two hours at the nunciature, chatting with Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino, archbishop of Habana and created cardinal by John Paul II in the October 1994. – the first Cuban cardinal created after the <em>revoluciòn</em> and the second Cuban cardinal of all the times.</p>
<p>The creation of a cardinal was intended as a reconciliation gesture toward Cuba and toward Fidel Castro. And Castro responded by permitting to 2,500 Cuban faithful to fly to Rome and take part to Ortega’s consecration, while the Castro’s administration was represented by a upper-grade official that also took part to the official settlement in the Cathedral.</p>
<p>Back to Rome, cardinal Gantin reported to John Paul II about the improve of religious atmosphere in Cuba, and he also reported that Castro would more than properly welcome a Papal visit. «Changes toward the Church – Gantin said – are part of a wider change in Cuba, that is both social and economic change». And he added that «generally, the country urges big transformations, and these latter seem to have begum, albeit on a smaller scale». Gantin also affirmed that «the acceptation of the Church, with his features of serve of Truth an Peace, can already be a meaningful change of the Cuban government».</p>
<p><strong>John Paul II diplomatic approach</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>John Paul II’s diplomatic approach to Cuba has always been, since the beginning, linked with the hierarchy of Cuban Church. Similarly, the American ecclesiastical hierarchy had always been in touch with Cuba bishops. In 1972, the Conference of American Bishops backed the 1969 request by Cuban bishops to end the U.S. embargo against Cuba. In 1985, American and Cuban bishops conference exchanged a visit. One of the <a href="http://old.usccb.org/sdwp/international/debt110200.shtml">main supporters</a> of a new diplomatic tie between Cuba and U.S. and the most prominent personalities against the embargo was the cardinal Bernard Law, then archbishop of Boston. He visited Cuba in 1985, and then in 1989. Both in 1985 and in 1989, Law met Fidel Castro. Boston archdiocese, under Law’s administration, had its own aid-plans to Cuba, separated and different from the one of the other Catholic organization in the United States.</p>
<p>And then, the impact of the Etchegaray&#8217;s visits. After his first visit, the then president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace explained to the Pontiff that Catholic Church would be able to play a political role in Cuba. One only condition: the credibility of the Church «could not ever be put in discussion». Etchegaray moves, the events the Holy See followed and attentively orchestrated, showed that the aim had been reach: the Church was credible in Cuba, and it could so play a role in a quiet transition of powers in Cuba.</p>
<p>September, the 8<sup>th</sup> 1993, the 11 Cuban bishops wrote the message <a href="http://www.palabranueva.net/contens/0809/000102-1.htm"><em>El amor todo lo espera</em> (Love endures all things)</a>, underlining that «Cuban problems must be solved with the cooperation of all the Cubans», and that the Cubans «wish a friendly and free dialogue in order to cordially express their point of view… following mercy, amnesty and reconciliation» This message was a turnabout on the Church’s approach to the regime, since it substantially proposed to Castro and to his opponents – included the political refugees in the U.S.A. &#8211;  the opening of a political dialogue for a pacific national reconciliation.</p>
<p>Cardinal Etchegaray met  Fidel Castro once again on December 1993, and he spoke with him about the message of Cuban bishops. Both Castro and Etchegaray underlined their backing to peace, reconciliation and to the end of U.S.A. embargo. It was probably after that visit that Castro changed his attitude toward Catholic Church. The<em> lìder màximo</em> seemed to accept the role of the Holy See as a credible partner for the dialogue about the future of Cuba. At the same time, the regime abated the restrictions to the Cuban Church. And then, it was John Paul II that broke into the Cuban political scene, speaking for the first time against U.S. trade embargo.</p>
<p>And then, in 1996, John Paul II received Fidel Castro in Rome, in the Vatican. The feeling among the Castro and Wojtyla seems evident, and it is favorited by some concession Castro makes to the Catholic Church. It is the right time for a Papal trip to Cuba.</p>
<p><strong>John Paul II in Cuba</strong></p>
<p>«Cuba needs to open herself to the world and the world needs to draw close to Cuba», John Paul II <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980125_lahabana_en.html">said in Havana</a>, during his visit. All the diplomatic steps of the past had been fruitful, and for the Pope harvested the fruits of that dialogue. In <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980122_santa-clara_en.html">Santa Clara</a>, the Pope spoke about family, in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980123_camaguey_en.html">Camaguey</a> of young people, in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980124_santiago_en.html">Santiago de Cuba</a> of the homeland, in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1998/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19980123_lahavana-culture_en.html">Havana</a> of the mission of the Church. He openly criticized socialist society in Santa Clara, depicting it as a society that shares families, reduces the freedom of expression and the spaces for the pastoral action. This way of reading was obviously contested in Latin America. «The Pope – Frei Betto wrote after the visit – lacked of the right keys to acknowledge the originality of the Cuban social experiment, that undoubtedly is now influencing the redemption now in act in Latin American. Karol Wojtyla looked at Cuban socialism through his Polish lenses, as if the island was a country of the Eastern Europe». John Paul II also visited the Sanctuary of <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1998/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19980124_lahavana-san-lazaro_en.html">San Lazaro in Havana</a>, and there he talked about the Cuban health system, «an important conquer in the midst of the difficulties of the country». And in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980125_lahabana_en.html"><em>Plaza José Marti </em></a>he spoke against the neo-liberal capitalism and about the embargo against Cuba.  A new way was open in Vatican-Cuba relations</p>
<p><strong>Benedict XVI to Castro</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>And here is that Benedict XVI speaks to Fidel Castro about the absence of God. In the hands, a cup of coffee. In the front, a man that is thinking about the future of the world.</p>
<p>The absence of God is one of the main theme of Benedict XVI pontificate. He – during the <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/angelus/2011/documents/hf_ben-xvi_ang_20111127_en.html">Angelus</a> of the first Sunday of Advent 2011– recalled the words of the prophet Isaiah, and he denounced: «It seems to reflect certain panoramas of the post-modern world: cities where life becomes anonymous and horizontal, where God seems absent and man the only master, as if he were the architect and director of all things: construction, work, the economy, transport, the branches of knowledge, technology, everything seems to depend on man alone. And in this world that appears almost perfect at times disturbing things happen, either in nature or in society, which is why we think that God has, as it were, withdrawn and has, so to speak, left us to ourselves». And the Pope concluded: «In fact, the true &#8220;master&#8221; of the world is not the human being but God. The Gospel says: &#8220;Watch therefore — for you do not know when the master of the house will coming, in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or in the morning — lest he come suddenly and find you asleep&#8221; (Mk 13:35-36)».</p>
<p>Maybe the Pope had in mind these words when he spoke to Fidel Castro about the absence of God. His commitment as Pontiff is to turn faithful, the Church, the World to God. It is an evangelical commitment, and it is in contrast with the sufferance of the world. This sufferance – according to Benedict XVI – comes directly from the eclipse of God. And this eclipse of God is brought on by the human being himself.</p>
<p>When you put the man in the middle, and put aside God, that the most harrowing things happen, where one can experiment the «abandon of God». In Poland, when he visited the concentration camp in Birkenau, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/may/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060528_auschwitz-birkenau_en.html">Benedict XVI claimed</a>: «Where was God in those days?  Why was he silent?  How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil?». And the answer was always the same: «They wanted to kill God».</p>
<p>And now that Castro is so curious about spirituality; that Cuba is definitely opening even if a lot of steps are to be made; that everything is going to change; that in Cuba no one wants to kill God anymore; and that Cuba has been consecrated to the Virgen del Cobre; now what will be the future of Cuba?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/after-the-castros-interview-with-the-pope-what-will-be-the-future-of-cuba/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brazil, the challenge of evangelization</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/church/brazil-the-challenge-of-evangelization</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/church/brazil-the-challenge-of-evangelization#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 06:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolfo Nicolas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aparecida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apostolic See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card. Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Base Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clodovis Boff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference of the Bishops of Latin America and Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrinal Note on some aspects of Evangelization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go and Make disciples of alla nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Dupuis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesuit University of Valle del Rio dos Sinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paul II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Sobrino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo Boff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberation Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertatis Nuntiandi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertatis Nuntius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ngo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentecostal sect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentecostalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter C. Phan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista Eclesiàstica Brasileira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Haight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Doctrine of the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society of Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Youth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyd2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wyd_2013.jpg"></a>The next 18th of September, the Cross of the World Youth Day will be in Sao Paulo, Brazil. For the occasion, there will be a big festival: the preparation for the next World Youth Day (<a href="http://www.religionnews.com/index.php?/pressreleases/world_youth_day_rio_de_janeiro_braziljuly_2013_4th_post/">scheduled</a> in Rio de Janeiro, in 2013) will officially begin. There will be big attention for the World [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wyd_2013.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-590" title="Brazilian pilgrims lift the World Youth Day cross at the Cuatro Vientos aerodrome in Madrid" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wyd_2013-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The next 18th of September, the Cross of the World Youth Day will be in Sao Paulo, Brazil. For the occasion, there will be a big festival: the preparation for the next World Youth Day (<a href="http://www.religionnews.com/index.php?/pressreleases/world_youth_day_rio_de_janeiro_braziljuly_2013_4th_post/">scheduled</a> in Rio de Janeiro, in 2013) will officially begin. There will be big attention for the World Youth Day in Brazil. Brazil is the most Catholic country in the world, with 145 million baptized people – the 79 per cent of the population. Wyd is also more <a href="http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=11507">significant</a> in a country which lives the faith so strongly to become contradictory. On one side, the Liberation Theology, which is the main topic of a neverending debate in Brazil: nevertheless an increasing growth rate reached during the Lula administration (and Lula trained up with Liberation Theology), poverty is still a dramatic issue to face Brazil. On the other side, the increasing of the adherent to Christian Pentecostal Sects – John Paul II talked about them as  «fierce wolves» to underline their aggressive proselitism – is continuous. Nowadays, the Christian sects <a href="http://christianity.about.com/od/denominations/p/christiantoday.htm">can count</a> on 22 million followers. In 1991, they had just 13 million followers, the 10 per cent of Brazilian population.</p>
<p>Evangelization is the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j2zBNtaRiLPgQ6GHvm_PLEI2oIIA?docId=CNG.af132ca0e3a0fd2cd947182992220075.ab1">main topic</a> for Brazil. Benedict XVI made of evangelization a <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/135981">key point</a> of his trip to Brazil in 2007. He was the one who chose, for July 7, 2005, the theme of the fifth general conference of the bishops of Latin America and the Caribbean: «Disciples and missionaries of Jesus Christ». It was he who wanted that the other phrase of the title – «That all may have life» – should end by specifying: «in Him». And that the statement of Jesus himself should be added: «I am the way, the truth, and the life». Even the 2013 Wyd <a href="http://www.zenit.org/article-33275?l=english">theme</a> deals with the mission of evanelization: «Go and Make Disciples of All Nations».  The Pope himself underlined – during the <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/homilies/2007/documents/hf_ben-xvi_hom_20070511_canonization-brazil_en.html">homily</a> in the Holy Missal in Sao Paulo in 2007 – the need for a new evangelization. For Benedict XVI, a strong effort of evangelization is the real response to the attacks against the family, to the crimes against life, to the abandoning of Catholicism in favor of the new &#8220;evangelical&#8221; and Pentecostal sects. And priestly celibacy also weakens when «the structure of total consecration to God begins to lose its deepest meaning». And the poor must also be offered «the divine balm of the faith, without overlooking material bread».</p>
<p>The Papal words had been considered a provocation by many in Brazil. Liberation  Theology made of the poor the measure of all things and of the image of a revolutionary Jesus an example, Benedict XVI statements divide the families. For example, they have <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1337066?">divided</a> the brothers Clodovis and Leonardo Boff. Clodovis Boff is a member of the Servants of Mary, Leonardo Boff &#8211;  banned from teaching in Catholic theology faculties in a 1985 sentence from the congregation for the doctrine of the faith &#8211; left the Franciscan order and got married. He was one of the fathers of Liberation Theology, and recently he changed his <a href="http://leonardoboff.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/baixar-a-terra-da-cruz-e-ressuscita-la/">point of view</a>: the poor is still the center of his predication; but the poor is not intended to be the man, but the earth, and the measure of all thing is the ecology: taking care of the earth is taking care of the man.</p>
<p>By changing his point of view, Leonardo Boff got closer to the Pope: the attention for  the evironment and the ecology was such a key point in Benedict XVI’s pontificate that he was described as the «<a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto">Green Pope</a>» in the Us Secreatary of State dispatches leaked by <a href="http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/01/10VATICAN13.html">Wikileaks</a>, and that he was ranked 17th among the ‘top 100 global thinkers’ of 2009 for having «positioned the church prominently and unexpectedly as an advocate for the environment and warned against the perils of climate change». In fact, Benedict XVI view goes beyond. And Clodovis Boff goes beyond as well. His “conversion” was finally expressed in the <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/205710">essay </a>published in the <em>Revista Eclesiástica Brasileira</em>. In Clodovis Boff judgment, the «fatal» error into which it falls is that of setting up the poor as the «first operative principle of theology», substituting them for God and Jesus Christ.<br />
«The &#8216;pastoral action of liberation&#8217;  - Clodovis Boff wrote &#8211; becomes one of the many branches of the &#8216;popular movement&#8217;. The Church becomes like an NGO, and so also loses substance physically: it loses workers, militants, and faithful». Clodovis Boff seemed to have centered the key point, since this is probably the reason why a shortsighted vision of Liberation Theology is brought on from the so-called “secular world”, who committed in a struggle to make the Holy See an organization <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/undermining-the-holy-see-diplomacy-a-mission-impossible">on a par</a> with any Ngo, with no diplomatic weight.</p>
<p>Leonardo Boff <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/205711">replied</a> to his brother essay by claiming that «Clodovis has passed over body and soul to maintaining with naive optimism and youthful enthusiasm» the <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2007/may/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20070513_conference-aparecida_en.html">approach</a> dictated by the Latin American bishops at their continental conference held in Aparecida, Brazil, in May of 2007, and inaugurated by Benedict XVI in person”. Leonardo’s reply was publish on the <a href="http://www.ihu.unisinos.br/">Institute Humanitas Unisinos</a> website. It is the same Institute that <a href="http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/homepage/world-news/detail/articolo/vaticano-vatican-vaticano-gmg-7566/">scheduled</a> for October 8-11, 2012 a big congress on the Liberation Theology. Among the special guests, there should be Leonardo Boff. But none of the speakers still confirmed his participation. The news was nevertheless spread to a great <a href="http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/homepage/blog-oltre-tevere-di-giacomo-galeazzi/dettaglio-articolo/articolo/7595/">audience</a>, by claiming a counter position between the 2013 Wyd and the 2012 congress. The Christian Base Communities repeatedly accused Benedict XVI – as former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith – to have been the biggest censor of Liberation Theology. Just a few remember that there had been two notes of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith about the Liberation Theology: the <em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19840806_theology-liberation_en.html">Libertatis Nuntius</a> </em>(1984) and the <em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19860322_freedom-liberation_en.html">Libertatis Conscientia</a> </em>(1986). The first one can be considered the <em>pars destruens</em>  of a dialectic process, intended to purify Liberation Theology by its Marxist-oriented excesses; the second one can instead be considered the <em>pars construens </em>, in order to enhance the positive part of Liberation Theology. That is why the cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodriguez Maradiaga explains the reasons of the two notes in his Liberation Theology classes. Rodriguez <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/la-dottrina-sociale-il-segreto-pi%C3%B9-nascosto-03.06.2011.pdf">Maradiaga</a> links the notes of the Congretion for the Doctrine of the Faith to the Social Doctrine of the Chuch, which he defines «the best kept secret» of the Catholic world.</p>
<p>The key is the way one describes Jesus. The Jesuit University of Valle del Rio dos Sinos (40,000 students) is a prestigious center of cultural diffusion for all of South America and has recently launched a series of seminars to analyze the globalization project &#8211; developed from the beginning by the Society of Jesus &#8211; and its repercussions over the centuries, up to the present time. The aim, in particular, is to focus the action and the participation of the religious order on the formation and dissemination of modern culture and its spiritual and cultural role in Brazil and Latin America, through the missionary apostolate and educational efforts. During the last General Congregation of the Society of Jesus – that brought to the election of fr. Adolfo Nicolas as Superior General of the Jesuit – the Vatican <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/185721">admonished</a> the Jesuit to harmonize their position with the ones of the Apostolic See, in the name of the peculiar vote of obedience  to the Pope observed by the members of the Society.</p>
<p>In the last years, four Jesuit theologians had been banned by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the faith: <a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_it.html">Jacques Dupuis</a> in 2001, <a href="http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ITA2407/">Roger Haight</a> in 2004, <a href="http://www.thetablet.co.uk/article/9494">Jon Sobrino</a> in 2006 and <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/167881?eng=y">Peter C. Phan</a> in 2007. The key point was always the Jesus quest. Jesus is subjected to the canons of comprehension of secular culture. Jesus is so exalted as a great man and a worker of justice, but his divinity is obscured. The opposite of the Jesus of Nazaret <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/life-of-jesus-life-of-benedict">sketched</a> on the two books that Joseph Ratzinger dedicated to the Jesus as the gospels outline him (the third one will be published at the beginning of the next year).</p>
<p>The Jesus true man and true God was one of the main points of the <a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20071203_nota-evangelizzazione_en.html">Doctrinal Note on some aspects of the Evangelization</a>, delivered by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 2007. The note had been in reserve for a number of years, and then delivered as the introduction states – because of the  «growing confusion» over the Church&#8217;s duty to proclaim Jesus to the world, also penetrated within missionary institutes.</p>
<p>Among the causes of this growing confusion, there is the conviction that proposing Christian truth to others is an attack on their freedom and, at the same time, a conception of the Kingdom of God that is not identified in the person of Jesus Christ, but in «a generic reality that overarches all the religious experiences or traditions, toward which these should incline as toward a universal and indistinct communion of all those who seek God».   Spreading the news of Jesus true God and True man is the challenge of the Wyd 2013. The post-Wyd Madrid has already begun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/church/brazil-the-challenge-of-evangelization/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World imbalances: the challenge of the Church</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/world-imbalances-the-challenge-of-the-church</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/world-imbalances-the-challenge-of-the-church#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 06:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonio Fazio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card. Rodriguez Maradiaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caritas in Veritate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ficha Limpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hipc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imbalances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imdosoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institut des Artisans de Justice et de la Paix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesuit Center for Theological Reflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John XXIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malthus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mater et Magistra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mons. Mario Toso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social doctrine of Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/materetmagistra2011.jpg"></a>«G20 can be considered a club of friends. On the other hand, Holy See proposes a new world authority, in order to consider all the countries, the developing ones as well as the developed ones». Mons. Mario Toso, secretary of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, <a href="http://www.portalecnel.it/portale%5Crassegnastampaweb.nsf/0/C12575C30045F725C12577430021E233/$FILE/G20%20%20MONS%20%20TOSO%20%20INSUFFICIENTE%20A%20ORIENTARE%20VERSO%20BENE%20COMUNE.pdf">underlines</a> the doubts the Holy See [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/materetmagistra2011.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-376" title="materetmagistra2011" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/materetmagistra2011-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>«G20 can be considered a club of friends. On the other hand, Holy See proposes a new world authority, in order to consider all the countries, the developing ones as well as the developed ones». Mons. Mario Toso, secretary of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, <a href="http://www.portalecnel.it/portale%5Crassegnastampaweb.nsf/0/C12575C30045F725C12577430021E233/$FILE/G20%20%20MONS%20%20TOSO%20%20INSUFFICIENTE%20A%20ORIENTARE%20VERSO%20BENE%20COMUNE.pdf">underlines</a> the doubts the Holy See expresses toward G20 and the international congresses of that kind. Holy See has always committed itself in a multilateral diplomacy. The aim is to give voice to the poorest countries which are often excluded from the international concert.</p>
<p>Catholic Church was the first that spoke about world imbalances, fifty years ago, in the John  XXIII’s encyclical <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_15051961_mater_en.html"><em>Mater et Magistra</em></a>. The Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace celebrated the anniversary of this encyclical with an <a href="http://dottrinasocialedellachiesa.net/">international congress</a>. In the last fifty years, many things changed, but the request of Catholic Church. Which are the imbalances of today? Toso replies: «The imbalances between economics and politics, so the States sovereignty is not adequate to bear on the new financial international context». And then, «the imbalances between the up-to-bottom management of power and involvement of the whole population; the imbalances between social welfare policies and citizens. Beyond the demagogical matters, there is the lack of health care and guaranteed minimum pension for a large part of the world population». Still, there are the imbalances between «natural and energetic resources and the institutions that manage those resources – and that often penalize the poorest countries; between the respect for life since life is conceived and the global development; between the promotion of the right to religious freedom and the integral human development; between claimed and exaggerated rights and forgotten dues». And – finally – «the imbalance of the relationships between ecology and moral behaviour of the society and the imbalance between the thought and the gravity of social and cultural problems». This latter has been one of the key issues of Benedict XVI’s Pontificate, and that is why Ratzinger was nicknamed as ‘<a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto">the Green Pope</a>’. Mario Toso explains: «Nowadays, global justice is applied to ecology, as well. Human and environmental damages can be so serious that no insurance should balance them out. Some peculiar case – as, for example, the supply of arsenic water or nuclear escapes in Fukushima – brought so serious damages and so irreparable that there is no compensation would adequately payback».</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html">Caritas in Veritate</a> </em>asked for a reform of United Nations and a true world political authority «<em>to manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration</em>». Holy See worries are toward the poorest countries, annihilated from the First world economy.  «When I was involved on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavily_Indebted_Poor_Countries">HIPC campaign</a> – cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodrigues Maradiaga tells – and I took part to international summits, I always asked why, among all the Nobel prizes for Economics, there was no economist able to outline a more equitable development model. Nobody answered. But once, during a coffee break, one of the delegates told me not to ask for it anymore, since nobody had the will to change that model». Yet – Maradiaga affirms – «people know that they will suffer when the <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/index.htm">International Monetary Fund</a> intervenes in their country. People know the Imf will ask for economic adjustments: Vat and electricity bills will be increased, services will cost more, in order to adequate the economic system to First World standards. It is not right».</p>
<p>The integral human development can be reached through demographic development, as <em>Caritas in Veritate </em>explains. This issue is in strong contrast to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism">neo-malthusian</a> theories of the birth-control to sustain the economic development of a country. «Malthus – Mr. Antonio Fazio, former governor of Bak of Italy, explains &#8211; was obsessed from the demographic development of England. He feared that there would be no more space in the country and that demographic development could not be economically sustainable. No one remembers that Malthus was an Anglican pastor. He never thought about abortion. He recommended the abstinence from sex and the reduction of marriages to face the demographic emergency». The ones who brought on Malthus theories, on the other hand, are supporters of the birth-control and abortion. Life in change of a good economic development. On the other hand, there is another idea, maybe even more dangerous: have sons to distribute the national debt to the more people possible. Sons as a way to sustain the economy, and not as a purpose of the full development of human being. It is the opposite of Catholic beliefs.</p>
<p>The sons, the family, are the basis of society. This is subsidiarity, which begins from the small communities and ends to the larger one, from family to State and now to international concert. This kind of process gives birth to many <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/le-buone-pratiche-della-sussidiarietà-19.05.2011.pdf">good practices</a>, and Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace give some example of them at the International Congress about <em>Mater et Magistra. </em> Social Doctrine of the Catholic Church Study centers rise up in very difficult conditions, just see the job brought on from the <a href="http://www.doctrinesocialeeglise.org/spip.php?article121"><em>Institut des Artisans de Justice et de la Paix</em></a> in Benin and the <em><a href="http://www.jctr.org.zm/">Jesuit Center for Theological Reflection</a> </em>in Zambia. While in Mexico anticlericalism lives a sort of revival, the  <a href="http://www.imdosoc.org/">Imdosoc</a><strong> (</strong>Istituto Mexicano de Doctrina Social Cristiana) create networks, train up social entrepeneurs, teach the Social Doctrine, a “well kept secret” in Latin America, according to card. Maradiaga words. In Brazil, a popular initiative implemented by the Episcopal Conference brought to a national law for the eligibility of candidates, the <a href="http://www.fichalimpa.org.br/"><em>Ficha Limpa</em></a>.</p>
<p>Is it enough? The “diplomatic way” of Catholic Church has a larger point of view, and is in favor of a reform of United Nations. «Justice – mons. Toso says – must be founded on the acknowledge of the universal human good. Social conscience must be carried out in the market economy. A world governance based cooperation among nation is needed. It must be a true ‘world authority’, able to take <em>superpartes </em>decisions. A new economic, political and financial architecture is needed». Above all, the primacy of policy on the economy is needed to come back. What is now missing is a “catholic laity” able to undertake Christian values. There must be politicians Christianly trained up, able to understand the challenge of the Social Doctrine. In the front of world imbalances, this Christian laity must be able to give a concrete contributions to make everything more equal. It is now time that Social Doctrine of the Church is brought into action. Even if – monsignor Toso remarks – «politicians should be more exemplar in morality», and even more prepared. «There are prepared people –Toso says – but unfortunately the less prepared people prevail».</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/world-imbalances-the-challenge-of-the-church/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Green Pope, from Genesis to Kyoto</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caritas in Veritate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centesimus Annus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populorum Progressio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Day of Peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/green-pope.jpg"></a>Benedict XVI, the Green Pope: this has been the name often used to call Joseph Ratzinger since he is Pope. He has paid much attention to the topic of environment since his very first speech. He wrote about it in the encyclical <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html">Caritas in veritate</a>. He dedicated to this topic the 2010 World [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/green-pope.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-151" title="green pope" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/green-pope.jpg" alt="" width="256" height="194" /></a>Benedict XVI, the Green Pope: this has been the name often used to call Joseph Ratzinger since he is Pope. He has paid much attention to the topic of environment since his very first speech. He wrote about it in the encyclical <em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html">Caritas in veritate</a></em>. He dedicated to this topic the 2010 World Day of peace and the 2010 <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2010/january/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20100111_diplomatic-corps_en.html">address to the ambassadors</a> accredited to the Holy See. <em>Foreign Policy</em>, a prestigoious American geopolitics magazine, has ranked Benedict XVI 17th among the &#8216;top 100 global thinkers&#8217; of 2009. The reason? He «has positioned the church prominently and unexpectedly as an advocate for the environment and warned against the perils of climate change».</p>
<p>Public opinion got again aware of the Green Pope when Wikileaks began publishing the Us Embassy dispatches about the Vatican. The first cable about the Holy See was titled «<a href="http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/01/10VATICAN13.html">The Green Pope Supports US Path Forward From Copenhagen</a>». It tells about a meeting that took place on the 20<sup>th</sup> of January between an embassy officer and Dr. Paolo Conversi, according to the cable the  «point person on climate change» for the Holy See’s Secretariat of State. Conversi agreed to encourage countries «discreetly to associate themselves with the Accord, as opportunities arise». The Copenhagen Accord is a non-binding expression of commitment to reduce greenhouse emissions and to help developing countries adapt to anticipate climate changes.</p>
<p>Other cables talk about the<a href="http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/2005/08/05VATICAN514.html"> pressure of Us government</a> on the Vatican to make the Holy See change its position about Gmo. The Holy See refused, but promoted a sophisticated criticism stating that «a large diffusion of Gmo Food in developing countries would create a form of economic imperialism useful to enrich multinational corporations». Then, Marcelo Sanchezo Sorondo, Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, held a speech during which he stated that transgenic agriculture can be useful only in order to alleviate hunger in the world, but – on the other hand – transgenic agriculture should not become a way of speculating against the social justice. Sanchez Sorondo underlined that developing transgenic seeds to fight hunger is «a positive fact» that may help the assertion of «justice among goods and people». This statement was considered as a Vatican statement in favour of Gmo. That’s not true. The speech opened the debate inside the Church itself, which offers various standpoints about the issue.</p>
<p>Actually, there is not an official Vatican position on climate change, nor on Gmo because there is still nothing certain. The contribution of the Vatican to the debate is in order to alleviate world hunger. <em>Osservatore Romano</em>, Holy See newspaper underlined a couple of years ago that the problem was that everybody wanted the Church to be part of the debate, and everybody wanted the Church to be in favour of any topic. Vatican opinion is highly requested and it has a strong impact on public opinion. Another Wikileaks cable <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/10/wikileaks-pope-turkey-eu-muslim">reports</a> that «even more important than the Vatican&#8217;s lobbying assistance, however, is the influence the pope&#8217;s guidance can have on public opinion in countries with large Catholic majorities and beyond».</p>
<p>These are misleading analysis. True, the Vatican installed solar panels on Aula Paolo VI (its 10,000-seats main auditorium building), and it arranged to reforest land in Hungary to offset Vatican City’s carbon emissions. Benedict XVI considers the respect of the creation as a more in deep topic. Taking care of creation implies a relationship between the creator and what the creator created. So, the Vatican as a prudent approach to eco-issues: take care of the earth, but don’t consider the man as an intruder, and don’t fall on “Malthusian” adrift. Human being lives on the earth, and needs to take care of the earth to respect himself and the future generations. From Genesis to Kyoto Protocol, it’s always the same. Even former Popes deserved to environmental issues the same attentions. Pope Paul VI, in his 1967 encyclical <em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html">Populorum Progressio</a></em>, linked heavy consumption to injustice, declaring that «no one may appropriate surplus goods solely for his own private use when others lacks the bare necessities of life… The earth belongs to everyone, not the rich». John Paul II added a spiritual dimension in <em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus_en.html">Centesimus annus</a></em>, critiquing «a style of life which is presumed to be better when it is directed towards having rather than being». The late Pope so urged people to «create life-styles in which the quest for truth, beauty, goodness and communion with others for the sake of common growth are the factors which we may use responsibly to satisfy our legitimate needs, material or otherwise, while respecting the intrinsic balance of the creation».</p>
<p>Benedict XVI is in continuity with this statements of his predecessors. He indissolubly links the care to creation to the car to human being. A proof is in the themes the Pope chose for World Day Peace: truth (<em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20051213_xxxix-world-day-peace_en.html">In Truth, Peace</a></em>, 2006), dignity of human being (<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20061208_xl-world-day-peace_en.html"><em>The Human Person, the heart of peace</em>,</a> 2007), unity of human family (<em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20071208_xli-world-day-peace_en.html">The Human Family, a Community of peace</a></em>, 2008), the poverty issue (<em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20081208_xlii-world-day-peace_en.html">Fight the poverty, build peace</a></em>, 2009) and finally guardianship of creation (<em><a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20091208_xliii-world-day-peace_en.html">If you want cultivate peace, protect the creation</a></em>, 2010). This is the path: from human being, to the community of human beings, to the care human being must have to the freedom of the other, as stated in the last message for the World Day of Peace, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20101208_xliv-world-day-peace_en.html"><em>Religious Freedom, a path to </em><em>peace</em></a>. From Genesis to Kyoto, attention is always focused on the human being. Ecology of nature, but of the man first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
