The approach of the highly-anticipated publication of the post-synodal apostolic exhortation that concludes the two Synods on the family may result in discussion focusing on an important topic. This topic is often overshadowed, though it is disturbing: how much has the Protestant Reformation had, and how much does it still have, an impact on the way Catholics perceive their Church?

The topic does not deal merely with the possible effects of the Reformation on Catholic discipline. It involves the nature itself of the Church of Rome as it has been historically conceived. Through his preaching, Martin Luther questioned the sovereignty of the Holy See. He replaced de facto the notions of freedom and responsible choices with the notion of mercy, and thus considered the human being not fully responsible for his choices, that is, not free. He unchained the Church from the authority of the Pope, and replaces the authority of the Pope with the authority of princes, that is, with secular power. Lastly, he initiated a denigrating campaign against the Catholic Church that still echoes in current anti-Catholic media campaigns.

“Martin Luther” (Siena: Cantagalli, 2015), a small book by the historian Angela Pellicciari, sheds light on the real contents of Martin Luther’s preaching and writings. Reading the book helps us to understand many of the current debates. Especially today it is important to be aware of the hidden and subtle enemy that is Protestantization.

Since Pope Francis was elected, these topics have become the center of the media agenda set for the Pope who came from Argentina. Pope Francis’ emphasis on mercy fits, in the end, with the notion of a Church necessarily disengaged on a political level, but very much engaged on social issues. Since the Pope did not take part in the Second Vatican Council, he was considered more vulnerable to the media campaign that tends to portray the Council as a rupture in the history of the Church.

That this was not the case has been proven by the extraordinary work of Archbishop Agostino Marchetto. Archbishop Marchetto authored three books on the history of the Second Vatican Council. The books are filled with documents that show that the Second Vatican Council was not about breaching the consistency of faith. The Council was not aiming at a different Church, with a different authority, eventually decentralized. The Council aimed at a Church able to use new language to describe the constant faith. The Pope was always the Pope; the Church was always Catholic, apostolic and Roman, Peter’s universality and authority were not to be undermined by the authorities of local bishops; priestly dignity was never put in question.

When the “media Council” finally broke out at the end of the Second Vatican Council, the campaign tried to lead the Church toward territories that the same bishops who took part in the Council did not want to explore. After the Second Vatican Council, debate mostly focused (1) on the possibility of married priests and female priesthood, (2) on the importance of local bishops, and even on an emphasis given to bishops by eventually admitting some of the members of the Council of the Synod to the Conclave, and (3) on a change of Church doctrine on sexual morality in order to adapt it better to the spirit of the world.

In fact, the drafting of “Humanae Vitae”, Blessed Paul VI’s encyclical on life and contraception, was characterized by a strong impact on the media. As one of the members of the drafting preparatory commission documented, the media sought to emphasize only selective viewpoints about the issues at stake, especially those more open to a possible change in sexual morality. Blessed Paul VI, a martyr of the Second Vatican Council because of his effort to preserve the unity of faith, circumvented the conclusions of the commission and reaffirmed Catholic doctrine as it was.

Not by chance, the possibility of a “pastoral updating” of “Humanae Vitae” was circulated during the last Synod on the family. Since some of the small group discussions during the Synod were about this issue, it might appear in the post-synodal apostolic exhortation that the Pope is drafting. Even the hermeneutic of the “case by case discernment” in terms of access to sacramental Communion for the divorced and remarried was originally based on the parish priest’s application of “Humanae Vitae” in the confessional. But pastoral practice based on a wise approach in the confessional is one thing, another is the institutionalization of a break with the Church’s doctrine. This way, the unity of doctrine collapses, as doctrine would be subject to every priest’s relativistic, subjective interpretation.

The push for subjectivity was one of Martin Luther’s arguments in his anti-Roman preaching. Angela Pellicciari writes: “With the elimination of the function of the magisterium, the denial of the priestly order, the exaltation of individual freedom and the rejection of the importance of works to achieve salvation, everyone makes his own decisions. Everyone reads the Bible and interprets it his own way, trusting in the Holy Spirit’s assistance.”

In the end, the risk of the institutionalization of “case by case discernment” is to arrive at the “by Scripture only” (sola fide) notion that Martin Luther promoted. The priest who discerns on a case by case basis puts aside the function of the magisterium and founds his activity on his personal interpretation of the Scriptures. He wields enormous discretionary power, but it is much more a human power than one derived from God.

In his encyclical Spe Salvi, Benedict XVI asks: “How could the idea have developed that Jesus’ message is narrowly individualistic and aimed only at each person singly? How did we arrive at this interpretation of the “salvation of the soul” as a flight from responsibility for the whole, and how did we come to conceive the Christian project as a selfish search for salvation which rejects the idea of serving others?”

Angela Pellicciari responds: “It did so because Luther has misinterpreted as slavery to Rome the universal charism of Peter and his function in defense of the whole Church. As a consequence, “the body has been abandoned”, it seems “in favor of souls, that is, of the most interior part of each of us, which corresponds to our conscience. It is as if soul and body are set one against the other, and each of them goes on its own. As if obedience to conscience is a substitute to obedience to Peter.”

These are still the main themes of our times. Unchaining the faithful from the authority of the Church, Luther gave to princes, the secular power, a fundamental role. He even claimed the authority of the secular power against the Pope, if the Pope makes mistakes. But the Pope’s authority, his sovereignty, is justified by the need for independence from secular power. Only this way – St. Leo the Great explained – can the Church be credible and really free.

When Luther breaks the Church’s unity with arguments and obfuscates much of the Church’s history, he creates a fertile ground wherein anti-Catholic hatred can ferment. The theme of the “free exam” is taken up by Freemasonry that – in the name of Reason – launched the strongest attack against Catholic Church teachings, undermining, in the first place, the Church’s authority.

After centuries, the Church’s authority has been undermined in public opinion which today endorses a poor Church that stays with the poor and is not involved in temporal issues (leaving to ‘princes’ the power to make decisions over the human being). The final aim is to undermine completely the teachings of the Church. This aim underlies many of the pressures moved toward Pope Francis to change Church teaching, or at least to be ambiguous enough in his statements to leave a space free for different interpretations.

This is the case with the post-synodal apostolic exhortation about which there is great anticipation concerning the extent to which its interpretation will swing from one side to another. It is noteworthy that the Church in Germany was the one that pushed hardest toward an agenda of mercy, the same reality of Church at local level that felt more than any other the impact of the Protestant reform, and that more than any other feels attracted to the spirit of the world. The system of the Church Tax (the Kirchensteuer) made it a rich local reality of the Church, but also worldly. Benedict XVI pointed to this worldliness in his speeches during his second trip to his homeland in 2011. The Pope also noted that secularizing trends have been providential, as they permitted the Church to rethink itself in more spiritual terms.

While everyone is pushing for a “more human Church”, a “more divine Church” is what is needed, as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger once observed. This is the issue. The subtle enemy that is Protestantization is always current, and it is perhaps the hidden enemy that the Church must fight above all others.

Will Pope Francis succeed in confronting it? Will he be able to go beyond the narratives that describe his as a “pontificate of rupture”, as the Second Vatican Council was considered a Council of rupture?

For this reason, the Second Vatican Council is now pivotal. The rigorous work of Archbishop Marchetto must be carefully read. His latest publication, the diaries of Pericle Cardinal Felici, Secretary of the Council, witness the tireless efforts of this Council Father to bring the Church to unity, despite the drifts that came out during the debates. It was not an attempt to suffocate the debate, but rather an attempt to give them a continuity with the history and the doctrine of the Church.

Looking forward to Pope Francis’ post-synodal document, these issues must be pondered. Even bishops and cardinals should do so. Pope Francis is changing the profile of bishops, and consequently that of the College of Cardinals. The Pope puts much emphasis on the local Churches; he does not want Class A and Class B dioceses any more. The upcoming Consistory (it will likely be held on February 20) should give us a clearer indication of Pope Francis’ ideas. That Consistory should be also place for a discussion about the post-synodal apostolic exhortation. Hence, we will be able to understand whether the College of Cardinals has fully understood the import of the issues at stake. The Church’s Protestantization would leave it short of defenses. The secular world could then “conquer Rome”, the accomplishment of which has always been its final goal.

 

5 Responses to Pope Francis: What is the Real Enemy?

  1. Mary scrive:

    Excellent article Andrea, God bless you. I am from the other side of the world (New Zealand) and all my life I have been made to feel uncomfortable and out of place because I am Catholic. In fact Catholics are often quietly really not even permitted to use the word Catholic. (Except when they are talking about homosexual pedophile priests). I have always had the thought that Protestantism is the Church’s greatest enemy, especially because they have a deliberate and obstinate refusal to obey Christ’s teaching and to accept His Church, in favor of their own thinking.

    Your article gives me strength and hope to be brave and not be afraid. I am not the only one who thinks like this.

  2. James scrive:

    Whenever I abandon hope in your perspective you return with a flourish. This article is an invaluable call to awareness of arguably the most pernicious offensive against Roman Catholicism, known since it was spawned, but now masked – primarily by Roman Catholic “scholars” enabled by duplicitous ecclesiastics – with the term ecumenism. You need be applauded for exercising the fortitude to discuss this glaring and disturbing reality. There are many who will not appreciate the raking light you bring to this reality.
    Protestant communities have no interest at all in unity with Roman Catholicism. They hold us in contempt at best, but tragically far more frequently we are termed a joke. They have no interest in us beyond the deconstruction of Roman Catholicism and the concurrent justification of their own historical aberrance – theological and moral. Many Catholics engaged in this endeavor appear to share that goal and are duplicitous, others are simply delusional or naïve. Having spent ten years working in a trans-denominational seminary of great repute, I assure you, this is the “oikoumene” reality.
    Mainline protestantism has devolved into some sort of “ethical” cultural society with no regard for the Creed. Roman Catholic theologians burdened with an academic inferiority complex acquired in the late nineteenth century, metastasized through the first half of the twentieth, vested themselves in speculative academic inquiry rooted in skepticism, abandoning authentic theological reflection rooted in religious fidelity sustained by prayer. To the extent Roman Catholicism has collapsed into this quagmire, we have advanced toward unity in disbelief. To the extent we have resisted this grievous gravitational force we are farther afield from each other than we were fifty years ago.
    I suspect ecclesiastics and theologians “in the know” have entirely abandoned Roman Catholicism and have yet to let any of us groundlings in on the secret. The spectrum of ecclesiastics presently holding the reigns makes me think this the likely scenario. The odor of sanctity is not to be detected here, rather the opposite. Pastoral care with benefit of the “wink and the nod” is fraudulent and the work of the Adversary. Accountability, something woefully absent in the post-conciliar Church, starts at the top.
    Does Pope Francis wish to confront and correct the protestant trajectory by which the Church is presently propelled, or is this agenda his, was it his mandate from the conclave? I know what I hope to be true, but the evidence appears to undermine this hope of mine. May the future find my fears unfounded and my hope affirmed and fulfilled.

  3. FrankieB scrive:

    Andrea, the Pope and the Vatican are worried about reaching out to groups or individuals who for the most part do not CARE about the Catholic Church. Meanwhile, loyal Catholics are ignored or mocked.

    Mass attendance is plummeting worldwide and especially in Europe and the U.S., Catholic institutions are under assault, and yet the Pope and his advisors are focused on the temperature of the air. Is he kidding ?

    His favorite theologian is Kasper ? A guy who wants to turn Catholic teachings into Protestantism ? A guy who presides over a country where Mass attendance is close to 5% ? The Pope knows this — he mentioned it in his recent trip to Germany or at least read the talking points — so why in God’s Name would he think that the German Church or any of its apostate leaders should be listened to ? Why is the Pope enamored with those who want to dilute Church teaching ?

    Does the Pope intend to ‘reach out’ and show ‘mercy’ by declaring that belief in God is optional ? Might be a good way to appeal to atheists.

  4. James scrive:

    We are “pastored” by a bunch of old men continuing to endorse the catastrophic trajectory assumed when they were wet-behind-the-ears right out of the seminary, supporting at all cost the failed and ruinous “ecumenism” and its attendant notions. As they stand on the doorstep of eternity they leave behind, in reality, bequest of a three-quarter empty church constructed of matchsticks, plastic tape and mutilated paper-clips deconstructing each time someone takes a breath.
    The bloom is long off the rose. “The council” is old and moth eaten, particularly when its documents have been as abused as the entire enterprise was when it happened. It really doesn’t cut the mustard the way it used to. The heterodox find it antiquated, outmoded and, of all things, irrelevant. The orthodox faithful are tired of being hit over the head with an event that has only led to a Roman Catholicism well into looking and smelling like hell on earth.
    Now we must endure desperate efforts of those drowning in geriatric delusion, fortressed in Latin American “cha-cha-cha” and Teutonic hubris, commandeering all manner of confection to prop-up an unsupportable legacy. Mortifying to think that the scorn once heaped upon our beloved priests by the aberrant and the heretical just very well might be deserved.

Rispondi a Mary Annulla risposta

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato.

È possibile utilizzare questi tag ed attributi XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>