<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MondayVatican &#187; MondayVatican &#8211; Charles Darwin » After the Castro&#8217;s interview with the Pope, what will be the future of Cuba?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mondayvatican.com/tag/charles-darwin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com</link>
	<description>Vatican at a Glance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>After the Castro&#8217;s interview with the Pope, what will be the future of Cuba?</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/after-the-castros-interview-with-the-pope-what-will-be-the-future-of-cuba</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/after-the-castros-interview-with-the-pope-what-will-be-the-future-of-cuba#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelo Becciu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archdiocese of Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernardin Gantin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birkenau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloqueo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ's Nativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological quest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el amor todo lo espera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enrique Lopez Oliva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frei Betto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Granma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helms-Burton Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaime Ortega y Alamino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paul II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la religion en cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberation Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lìder màximo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Theresa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostpolitik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papal diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pesach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raul Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reconciliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renato Raffaele Martino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Etchegaray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tarcisio Bertone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgen del Cobre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall of Berlin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/b16fidel.jpg"></a>In the living room of the cardinal Roger Etchegaray’s house in Rome a Cuban Christ&#8217;s Nativity is exposed since more than 20 years. The Christ’s  Nativity is a present Fidel Castro made to him during one of their meeting, between the end of 80s and the beginning of 90s. Roger Etchegaray <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1989-01-21/local/me-910_1_roman-catholic-church">first met [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/b16fidel.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-916" title="b16fidel" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/b16fidel-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In the living room of the cardinal Roger Etchegaray’s house in Rome a Cuban Christ&#8217;s Nativity is exposed since more than 20 years. The Christ’s  Nativity is a present Fidel Castro made to him during one of their meeting, between the end of 80s and the beginning of 90s. Roger Etchegaray <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1989-01-21/local/me-910_1_roman-catholic-church">first met the <em>lìder màximo </em>in 1989</a>: the cardinal was still president of the <a href="http://www.justpax.it/">Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace</a>, and went secretly to Cuba to strengthen the relationships between Cuba and the Holy See. Cuba was beginning to open up to world, but the world was still not open to Cuba.</p>
<p>Benedict XVI came to visit Cuba the last week, and many things of changed. Fidel is not governing any more, and the new <em>lìder </em>is his brother Raul.  Fidel Castro is now a more than 80 years old private citizen, and he is living the end of his life writing and thinking. Yet in 1989, Fidel Castro explained to Etchegaray that his «reference points» were <em>The Capital</em> by Karl Marx and the Gospel. It was not surprising. Just a few remember that Castro – a self proclaimed atheist – <a href="http://goodjesuitbadjesuit.blogspot.it/2007/12/fidel-castro-jesuit-educated.html">studied in a Jesuit school</a>. Fidel Castro considers  his <em>revoluciòn</em> as a deeply religious fact – and maybe this view has been influenced by Frei Betto, a radical priest, Liberation theologian, who talked several times with Castro during the 80s. Now, Fidel Castro is a different man: he is not imprisoned by his myth anymore. Now he can be who he truly is: a man that is searching for the sense of life.</p>
<p><strong>The meeting with Benedict XVI </strong></p>
<p>March, 28<sup>th</sup> 2012. At around noon and a half, a white car parks in the front of the Holy See Nuntiature to Cuba. Fidel Castro <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/attivita-del-papa/2-il-papa/2339-fidel-castro-prende-il-caffe-con-il-papa.html">went to visit the Pope</a>, accompanied by his restricted convoy staff, his wife and his two sons. Right in time for the after lunch coffee – he and the Pope drank it during their private meeting. Castro is welcomed by cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Vatican Secretary of State. Bertone and Castro already knew each other. Bertone <a href="http://www.ilportonedibronzo.it/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=215:cuba-attende-il-papa&amp;catid=1:ultime&amp;Itemid=50">went to Cuba in 2008</a>, to celebrate the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the memorable visit to Cuba of John Paul II. And he came back to Rome with the Fidel’s invitation to the Pope in his pockets. Before, in 2006 Renato Raffaele Martino went to Cuba to present the Compendium for the Social Doctrine of the Church, met Fidel Castro and got from him an invitation for John Paul II. And even msgr. Angelo Becciu, Substitute (number 2) of the Vatican Secretary of State got invitation for the Pope when he was at his previous post of Papal nuncio to Cuba.</p>
<p>Some years have passed by before those invitations could become real. In the meantime, Fidel Castro fell sick, transferred all of his powers to his brother Raul, chose to retire. It is not time for rallies anymore, and Fidel makes his (few) political proclaims to his <em>reflecciones</em> published on the web-site <a href="http://www.cubadebate.cu/"><em>Cuba Debate</em></a>. For Fidel, it is time to think. On his bedside table, Fidel still has <em>The Capital</em> by Karl Marx and <em>The Origin of the Species</em> by Charles Darwin. But – someone close to him confess – he often meditate the Gospel, that he knows since the Jesuits school’s time. «I could go to school, to Jesuit school – Castro <a href="http://www.libertaepersona.org/wordpress/2012/03/fidel-castro-e-la-chiesa/">once explained</a> – because the priests did not have an income. They just got food and shelter and they lived in austerity. Austere, serious, ready to sacrifice and hardworking, Jesuits served for free, and this is how they cut the outcomes». More: «The spirit  of sacrifice and the austerity of Jesuits, their way of living, their work and their commitment made the school accessible for a very cheap price. All of those Jesuits were politically right-oriented.  Some of them were obviously generous and they express their solidarity to other people. Under certain aspects, they were irreprehensible». Yet, they «appreciated good attitudes, the correctness, the honesty, the courage, the skill to the sacrifice». But «I – Castro concluded – never really had a religious conviction or a religious faith. No-one was able to instill it to it. I instead have a political faith that makes me a trusted and optimist man». This anecdote tells how much Church is – and has always been – important in Cuba.</p>
<p>The Church is so important in Cuba that Raul Castro &#8211; that is driving Cuba through a difficult transition – had <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/attivita-del-papa/2-il-papa/2336-il-papa-e-raul-castro-a-colloquio-per-45-minuti.html">a 40 minutes private meeting</a> with Benedict XVI and wanted to be with the Pope in every moment: he welcomed the Pope – and it was not previewed &#8211; also at the airport of La Habana.</p>
<p>When the Pope landed at Santiago de Cuba, Raul <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/the-pope/9168532/Pope-arrives-in-Cuba-to-a-greeting-from-Raul-Castro.html">held a long speech</a> – a sort of rally – speaking about the difficulties of Cuba, especially because of the <em>bloqueo</em>, the U.S. embargo to Cuba. In fact, there is a way out of the embargo: the importation from the United States (especially raw materials) goes from the U.S. to Cuba through military channels, and even the paper on which the newspaper of the regime <em>Granma </em>is printed comes from the United States.</p>
<p>Fidel Castro did not want that his meeting with the Pope could be charged with a political meaning. He is not the <em>lìder màximo</em>, now. He is spending is old age reading and studying. More than all, he is now looking for truth. And who is the best person to talk with, if not the Pope that always talks about truth?</p>
<p><strong>Interview with the Pope </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Fidel Castro arrives at the Nunciature after lunch, and after the Mass the Pope held in <em>Plaza de la Revoluciòn</em>. There, the Pope <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/attivita-del-papa/2-il-papa/2338-la-messa-del-papa-in-plaza-de-la-revolucion-la-chiesa-deve-contare-sulla-liberta-religiosa.html">pronounced</a> 20 times the word «truth» and 12 times the word «freedom», which are – the Pope <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/homilies/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_hom_20120328_la-habana_en.html">explains</a> – linked and indispensible the one with the other, and that are expression of an only reality that is realized in Christ, the only one that «show us the truth and give us genuine freedom The truth is a desire of the human person, the search for which always supposes the exercise of authentic freedom».</p>
<p>Here they are, having coffee together. On one side, Fidel, making questions. On the other side, Benedict XVI, giving answers. «What does a Pope do?», Fidel Castro asks. «He serves the universal Church», Benedict XVI replies. Castro thanked the Pope for the beatifications of Mother Theresa, benefactor of Cuba – he was very grateful to her – and John Paul II, the first Pope who visited Cuba.</p>
<p>If Fidel Castro is a man full of questions, Benedict XVI seems to have all the answers: his faith is feed with reason, the word becomes Word. And this Word is edgy like sword. «Cuba made some steps forward», Benedict XVI said during the Mass in the morning. But – he added then – this is not sufficient.</p>
<p>During the private meeting, Fidel Castro also asked about the current difficulties of humanity (recently, Fidel Castro became <a href="http://www.ilfoglio.it/soloqui/12790">interested on the ecological quest</a>, and the <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/the-green-pope-from-genesis-to-kyoto">«Green Pope»</a> – as Benedict XVI has been defined – seems to be the best interlocutor), and he underlined «the difficulties of Science to respond to the current questions of the humanity». These are the topical issues of the Benedict XVI’s magisterium. And so the Pope explains the problem of the absence of God and its consequences, and speaks about the relationship between faith and reason. Fidel Castro is curious. «His Holiness – he asks – would you send me some books to flesh out what you just said to be?» «I must think the proper books to send you», the Pope answers.</p>
<p><strong>The past Fidel </strong></p>
<p>Fidel Castro is now searching for something beyond reality. Yet, he is the one that more than any other <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Cuba#Religious_freedom">tried to eradicate</a> Christianity from his country. After the <em>revoluciòn</em>, religious activities and proselytism were limited, and – since 1961 – the ecclesiastical goods were confiscated without any compensation, and hundreds of foreigner member of the clergy were expelled from the island. In Cuba, there was State atheism until 1992. Then, the turning: the <a href="http://www.cubanet.org/ref/dis/const_92_e.htm">Cuban constitution </a>of 1992 pledge religious freedom (art. 55). In fact, more than religious freedom, it is a sort of freedom of worship. Only after the John Paul II visit’s they who attend Masses are not considered suspicious, the Christmas day is considered a national holiday – and after Benedict XVI’s visits the Good Friday <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/component/content/article/29-le-opinioni/2353-la-pasqua-di-cuba.html">has become a national Holyday in Cuba</a> – and some religious groups obtained the permission to import religious materials and to meet leader of their religion. This is also a sign of the diplomatic impact of the Catholic Church. For example, the John Paul II’s visit to Cuba opened to the concession to the Jewish community in Cuba to publicly celebrate their rights and to import religious material and kosher food for their Pesach (Easter).</p>
<p><strong>The diplomatic impact of the Church in Cuba</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>But there is a long story about the diplomatic impact of Catholic Church in Cuban affairs. Christmas 1989: the wall of Berlin just fell down, and cardinal Roger Etchegaray, then president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, is in Cuba. His mission? Bridging. Cardinal Roger Etchegaray – at the end of his mission, at the end of the New Year’s Mass &#8211; posed a crowd-pleasing question: «What message shall I take to the Pope?» «That he come! That he come! That he come!» thousands of voices roared in unison. «I hear your message &#8211; replied Etchegaray &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what he will say, but I am certain he will come». Etchegaray&#8217;s nine-day Cuban tour was capped by an intimate meeting with Castro during Christmas week, underscored an easing of tensions between church and state in the officially atheist country, where practicing Christians and Jews have been objects of government repression for almost 30 years.</p>
<p>Castro made no secret of his eagerness to welcome the pontiff, partly because a visit would burnish his fading international image and partly because he believed John Paul sees eye to eye with him on many of the world&#8217;s secular problems, such as disarmament and Third World debt and poverty.</p>
<p>Despite longstanding diplomatic relations between Havana and the Vatican, John Paul II was cautious, waiting for positive steps toward religious freedom by the Cuban government before committing himself. Castro&#8217;s steps toward detente with Catholics, Protestants and Jews in Cuba were mostly small but significant, wrote Enrique Lopez Oliva, a professor of religion and history at Havana University who was then permitted to circulate the country&#8217;s only independent publication, a twice-monthly newsletter, <a href="http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=65729"><em>La Religion en Cuba</em></a>. But, however it  appeared, government tolerance of Lopez&#8217;s newsletter was relatively risk-free for the Castro regime. The copier-produced publication had a circulation of only 30 each issue and only 12 paid subscribers, all of them foreign journalists or embassies. Not all government steps toward better church-state relations have been such small ones, however. In a sharp turnabout from 1962, the government allowed in 1988 30 foreign priests to join the 210 native priests already working in Cuba. About 30 foreign nuns also arrived, and the Cuban leader was quoted as describing the nuns already working in Cuban hospitals and mental hospitals as «models for Communists».</p>
<p>Cuba&#8217;s relaxation of official restrictions on religion began with the unusual publication of a book-length series of interviews conducted with Castro in 1985 by Carlos Alberto Christo, a radical Brazilian priest who calls himself Father Betto.</p>
<p><strong><em>El bloqueo</em></strong><strong>, the Church and Papal Diplomacy</strong></p>
<p>Cuba, 1996. Just some days before sending its foreign minister to Havana, the <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-10-20/news/9610200210_1_archbishop-jean-louis-tauran-helms-burton-law-vatican-radio">Vatican issued</a> its first public attack on the principal U.S. law intended to isolate Cuba. The <a href="http://www.coha.org/helms-burton-act-resurrecting-the-iron-curtain/">Helms-Burton act</a>, which President Clinton signed in March after Cuba&#8217;s communist government shot down two U.S. civilian planes piloted by Cuban-Americans, allows Americans to sue foreign firms for using property seized from them after Cuba&#8217;s 1959 revolution. It also bans executives of suspect companies from entering the U.S.</p>
<p>Cardinal Roger Etchegaray called some provisions of the Helms-Burton Act «legally questionable» and noted that Cuba&#8217;s Roman Catholic bishops have spoken out against the legislation and told that Helms-Burton not only has drawn criticism in Latin America but from «the Western allies of the United States».</p>
<p>In the mean time, John Paul II decided to be directly involved in the Cuban affairs. Active, but mostly secret, diplomacy: this was the John Paul II’s<em> modus operandi</em>, a sort of revival of the <em>Ostpolitik</em> of the last Eighties, when the Pope had a topical rule in the transition of the Eastern Countries from Communism to Democracy.  And so, John Paul II acted in the way he acted with Poland, his native country: he asked to preach his political message of reconciliation among «all the Cubans» living in Cuba and in foreign countries; at the same time, he began a dialogue with Castro; and then, he auspicated the establishment of a diplomatic and political dialogue between Washington and Havana to favor a pacific transition in the island, when the time would come; above all, the pontiff auspicated the end of the American embargo in Cuba.</p>
<p>This was the climate, when the first steps for the historic John Paul II’s visit to Cuba are taking place. This secret diplomatic process had been set by the same John Paul II at the beginning of Nineties and developed through a series of high level meetings between Holy See and Castro’s officials.  Soviet Union had been for thirty years the main supplier of economic aids to Cuba: its collapse brought to a fall of Cuban economy and of the Cuban standard way of living – albeit this was low even during the best years of the Communist era. In the midst of this scenario, the Pope tought that the time had come to make some more step forward.</p>
<p>So, the 12<sup>th</sup> of July 1994, Bernardin Gantin, then Prefect of the Congregation of Bishops and President of the Pontifical Commission for the Central America, had <a href="http://www.zenit.org/article-29683?l=italian">a private meeting</a> with Fidel Castro in the Holy See Nunciature in Cuba. Then, Castro spent two hours at the nunciature, chatting with Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino, archbishop of Habana and created cardinal by John Paul II in the October 1994. – the first Cuban cardinal created after the <em>revoluciòn</em> and the second Cuban cardinal of all the times.</p>
<p>The creation of a cardinal was intended as a reconciliation gesture toward Cuba and toward Fidel Castro. And Castro responded by permitting to 2,500 Cuban faithful to fly to Rome and take part to Ortega’s consecration, while the Castro’s administration was represented by a upper-grade official that also took part to the official settlement in the Cathedral.</p>
<p>Back to Rome, cardinal Gantin reported to John Paul II about the improve of religious atmosphere in Cuba, and he also reported that Castro would more than properly welcome a Papal visit. «Changes toward the Church – Gantin said – are part of a wider change in Cuba, that is both social and economic change». And he added that «generally, the country urges big transformations, and these latter seem to have begum, albeit on a smaller scale». Gantin also affirmed that «the acceptation of the Church, with his features of serve of Truth an Peace, can already be a meaningful change of the Cuban government».</p>
<p><strong>John Paul II diplomatic approach</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>John Paul II’s diplomatic approach to Cuba has always been, since the beginning, linked with the hierarchy of Cuban Church. Similarly, the American ecclesiastical hierarchy had always been in touch with Cuba bishops. In 1972, the Conference of American Bishops backed the 1969 request by Cuban bishops to end the U.S. embargo against Cuba. In 1985, American and Cuban bishops conference exchanged a visit. One of the <a href="http://old.usccb.org/sdwp/international/debt110200.shtml">main supporters</a> of a new diplomatic tie between Cuba and U.S. and the most prominent personalities against the embargo was the cardinal Bernard Law, then archbishop of Boston. He visited Cuba in 1985, and then in 1989. Both in 1985 and in 1989, Law met Fidel Castro. Boston archdiocese, under Law’s administration, had its own aid-plans to Cuba, separated and different from the one of the other Catholic organization in the United States.</p>
<p>And then, the impact of the Etchegaray&#8217;s visits. After his first visit, the then president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace explained to the Pontiff that Catholic Church would be able to play a political role in Cuba. One only condition: the credibility of the Church «could not ever be put in discussion». Etchegaray moves, the events the Holy See followed and attentively orchestrated, showed that the aim had been reach: the Church was credible in Cuba, and it could so play a role in a quiet transition of powers in Cuba.</p>
<p>September, the 8<sup>th</sup> 1993, the 11 Cuban bishops wrote the message <a href="http://www.palabranueva.net/contens/0809/000102-1.htm"><em>El amor todo lo espera</em> (Love endures all things)</a>, underlining that «Cuban problems must be solved with the cooperation of all the Cubans», and that the Cubans «wish a friendly and free dialogue in order to cordially express their point of view… following mercy, amnesty and reconciliation» This message was a turnabout on the Church’s approach to the regime, since it substantially proposed to Castro and to his opponents – included the political refugees in the U.S.A. &#8211;  the opening of a political dialogue for a pacific national reconciliation.</p>
<p>Cardinal Etchegaray met  Fidel Castro once again on December 1993, and he spoke with him about the message of Cuban bishops. Both Castro and Etchegaray underlined their backing to peace, reconciliation and to the end of U.S.A. embargo. It was probably after that visit that Castro changed his attitude toward Catholic Church. The<em> lìder màximo</em> seemed to accept the role of the Holy See as a credible partner for the dialogue about the future of Cuba. At the same time, the regime abated the restrictions to the Cuban Church. And then, it was John Paul II that broke into the Cuban political scene, speaking for the first time against U.S. trade embargo.</p>
<p>And then, in 1996, John Paul II received Fidel Castro in Rome, in the Vatican. The feeling among the Castro and Wojtyla seems evident, and it is favorited by some concession Castro makes to the Catholic Church. It is the right time for a Papal trip to Cuba.</p>
<p><strong>John Paul II in Cuba</strong></p>
<p>«Cuba needs to open herself to the world and the world needs to draw close to Cuba», John Paul II <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980125_lahabana_en.html">said in Havana</a>, during his visit. All the diplomatic steps of the past had been fruitful, and for the Pope harvested the fruits of that dialogue. In <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980122_santa-clara_en.html">Santa Clara</a>, the Pope spoke about family, in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980123_camaguey_en.html">Camaguey</a> of young people, in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980124_santiago_en.html">Santiago de Cuba</a> of the homeland, in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1998/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19980123_lahavana-culture_en.html">Havana</a> of the mission of the Church. He openly criticized socialist society in Santa Clara, depicting it as a society that shares families, reduces the freedom of expression and the spaces for the pastoral action. This way of reading was obviously contested in Latin America. «The Pope – Frei Betto wrote after the visit – lacked of the right keys to acknowledge the originality of the Cuban social experiment, that undoubtedly is now influencing the redemption now in act in Latin American. Karol Wojtyla looked at Cuban socialism through his Polish lenses, as if the island was a country of the Eastern Europe». John Paul II also visited the Sanctuary of <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1998/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19980124_lahavana-san-lazaro_en.html">San Lazaro in Havana</a>, and there he talked about the Cuban health system, «an important conquer in the midst of the difficulties of the country». And in <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1998/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19980125_lahabana_en.html"><em>Plaza José Marti </em></a>he spoke against the neo-liberal capitalism and about the embargo against Cuba.  A new way was open in Vatican-Cuba relations</p>
<p><strong>Benedict XVI to Castro</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>And here is that Benedict XVI speaks to Fidel Castro about the absence of God. In the hands, a cup of coffee. In the front, a man that is thinking about the future of the world.</p>
<p>The absence of God is one of the main theme of Benedict XVI pontificate. He – during the <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/angelus/2011/documents/hf_ben-xvi_ang_20111127_en.html">Angelus</a> of the first Sunday of Advent 2011– recalled the words of the prophet Isaiah, and he denounced: «It seems to reflect certain panoramas of the post-modern world: cities where life becomes anonymous and horizontal, where God seems absent and man the only master, as if he were the architect and director of all things: construction, work, the economy, transport, the branches of knowledge, technology, everything seems to depend on man alone. And in this world that appears almost perfect at times disturbing things happen, either in nature or in society, which is why we think that God has, as it were, withdrawn and has, so to speak, left us to ourselves». And the Pope concluded: «In fact, the true &#8220;master&#8221; of the world is not the human being but God. The Gospel says: &#8220;Watch therefore — for you do not know when the master of the house will coming, in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or in the morning — lest he come suddenly and find you asleep&#8221; (Mk 13:35-36)».</p>
<p>Maybe the Pope had in mind these words when he spoke to Fidel Castro about the absence of God. His commitment as Pontiff is to turn faithful, the Church, the World to God. It is an evangelical commitment, and it is in contrast with the sufferance of the world. This sufferance – according to Benedict XVI – comes directly from the eclipse of God. And this eclipse of God is brought on by the human being himself.</p>
<p>When you put the man in the middle, and put aside God, that the most harrowing things happen, where one can experiment the «abandon of God». In Poland, when he visited the concentration camp in Birkenau, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/may/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060528_auschwitz-birkenau_en.html">Benedict XVI claimed</a>: «Where was God in those days?  Why was he silent?  How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil?». And the answer was always the same: «They wanted to kill God».</p>
<p>And now that Castro is so curious about spirituality; that Cuba is definitely opening even if a lot of steps are to be made; that everything is going to change; that in Cuba no one wants to kill God anymore; and that Cuba has been consecrated to the Virgen del Cobre; now what will be the future of Cuba?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/after-the-castros-interview-with-the-pope-what-will-be-the-future-of-cuba/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Norway with hate. Why was Breivik depicted as a Christian fundamentalist?</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/from-norway-with-hate-why-was-breivik-depicted-as-a-christian-fundamentalist</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/from-norway-with-hate-why-was-breivik-depicted-as-a-christian-fundamentalist#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Pike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Breivik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan O'Neill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card. Kurt Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian fundamentalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemasonry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giuseppe Mazzini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Harald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight TEmplar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lodge St. Olaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London 7/7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luteran Church of Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiculturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Pagan Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norwegian Order of Freemasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timo Soini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy McVeigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Day of Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Oslo-Bombing.jpg"></a>Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, <a href="http://www.agi.it/english-version/world/elenco-notizie/201107301419-cro-ren1027-cardinal_koch_takes_papal_solidarity_to_norway">went</a> to an official visit to Norway to take «the solidarity of the Catholic Church and the solidarity of the Holy Father, in particular, to Norway at this tragic time, along with greetings for the great Feast of St Olaf, which was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Oslo-Bombing.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-518" title="Oslo-Bombing" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Oslo-Bombing-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, <a href="http://www.agi.it/english-version/world/elenco-notizie/201107301419-cro-ren1027-cardinal_koch_takes_papal_solidarity_to_norway">went</a> to an official visit to Norway to take «the solidarity of the Catholic Church and the solidarity of the Holy Father, in particular, to Norway at this tragic time, along with greetings for the great Feast of St Olaf, which was celebrated yesterday». And the Pope sent a condolences message to the Norway’s King Harald. «At this time of national grief – the Pope <a href="http://www.patheos.com/community/deaconsbench/2011/07/23/quote-of-the-day-the-pope-on-norway/">wrote</a> – I pray that all Norwegians will be spiritually united in a determined resolve to reject the ways of hatred and conflict and to work together fearlessly in shaping a future of mutual respect, solidarity and freedom for coming generations». But after the terroristic attacks to Norway, even the Catholic Church <a href="http://www.getreligion.org/index.php?s=Anders+Behring+Breivik&amp;submit.x=29&amp;submit.y=27">can feel</a> a little more under attack.</p>
<p>Because Anders Reivik – the author of the terror attack in Norway that caused more than 80 death people – has been initially described by the press as <a href="http://www.lhrtimes.com/norwegian-police-officer-gunned-down-at-least-84-people-at-an-island-youth-camp.html">a Christian fundamentalist</a>. Breivik was – according to the first <a href="http://dekerivers.wordpress.com/2011/07/23/anders-behring-breivik-gun-loving-right-wing-christian-kills-at-least-92-people-in-norway-obsession-with-marxists-muslims-norway%E2%80%99s-multicultural-ideals/">reports</a> – a Christian obsessed by the Islamic world and by multiculturalism. It was just like every right-nationalist is more likely to any other to have Christian roots, or like being Christian fundamentalists is the only way to be ferociously anti-islamic.</p>
<p align="left">Recently, this have become a common reading of the facts. In Finland, <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/international-affairs/from-finland-with-love-is-catholic-thought-going-to-be-a-minority-to-protect">Timo Soini</a>, a Christian nationalist, had been accused of xenophobia. In Hungary, the new <a href="http://presidentialactivism.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/full-english-text-of-the-new-hungarian-constitution/">Constitution</a> has been founded on Christian roots, and had been <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/church/christianity-is-there-a-future-after-secularization">accused </a>of homophobia, xenophobia and backwardness. In the Usa, David Limbaugh <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/10/2/102405.shtml">highlighted</a> how the two most powerful molders of opinion in the nation, the media and Hollywood, are at the head of the line in the war on Christianity, frequently ridiculing and disparaging Christians in ways they would never dream of employing against any other group of Americans. David Limbaugh writes:  «This anti-Christian bias manifests itself in unflattering portrayals of Christians in Hollywood films and entertainment television, and also in the demonization of Christian conservatives in the media». And there are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith/post/norway-attacks-when-christianity-becomes-lethal/2011/07/25/gIQAPRw5YI_blog.html">academics</a> who are sharpening their swords and taking the usual swings at orthodox forms of religion.</p>
<p align="left">Whatever comes out about Ander Breivik, one thing is certain. He is far more complex than a common «Christian Fundamentalist». He was a Freemason and a Knight Templar, and <a href="http://www.bestgore.com/murder/anders-behring-breivik-video-manifesto-knights-templar-freemason/">immensely proud</a> to be it. The average Christian Fundamentalist is usually anti-Masonic, while Protestant Fundamentalists generally regard Freemasonry as occult and Pagan in nature, in essence very anti-Christian. The Catholic Church forbids all its members from becoming Freemasons <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_Freemasonry">under pain</a> of excommunication. The Protestant Fundamentalist position is – on the other hand &#8211; absolute and militant, by claiming that «Christians cannot be masons». Given the general position of Christian Fundamentalists on this issue, and given the fact that Breivik listed Freemasonry as an «interest» on his Facebook page up to the day of the massacre, it is virtually impossible for him to truly be a «Christian Fundamentalist».</p>
<p>In fact, Breivik was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Franklin1776/reminders-that-norwegian-_n_910097_99451768.html">baptized</a> into the state-run liberal Protestant Church (Lutheran Church of Norway), but later became disillusioned with the way in which Liberal Protestantism has sacrificed much of its historic Christian character. He once <a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/norway-killings-arrested-fundamentalist-christian-reveals-hatred-of-modern-church-in-blogs-52745/">blogged</a>: «Today&#8217;s Protestant church is a joke. Priests in jeans who march for Palestine and churches that look like minimalist shopping centres. I am a supporter of an indirect collective conversion of the Protestant church back to the Catholic». Breivik (a political Zionist) obviously had little knowledge of Catholicism, for if he did, he would have known that one of the biggest Christian supporters of a Palestinian State is none other than the Catholic Church.</p>
<p>But he was baptized «by his own free will» – as he said – probably in order to be accepted into the Norwegian Order of Freemasons (Norwegian: Den Norske Frimurerorden), is the Masonic Grand Lodge in Norway. The first lodge (St. Olai Lodge – Later changed to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Order_of_Freemasons">Lodge St. Olaus</a> to the white Leopard) was opened in 1749 and is still working. The Grand Lodge has followed the Swedish Rite since 1818, which requires its members to adhere to Christianity. During the union of Sweden-Norway, the Swedish-Norwegian king was Grand Master of the Order. The sovereign Grand Lodge of Norway was consecrated in 1891. As of 2009, the Order has about 20,000 members.</p>
<p align="left">In light of his membership in the Masonic Lodge however, Breivik could not be a Catholic, for that would require breaking membership with the Lodge prior to reception into the Catholic Church. More likely, Breivik was lamenting the loss of historic Christian culture, which according to his <a href="http://canspeccy.blogspot.com/2011/07/breiviks-manifesto.html">manifesto</a> he saw on par with historic Nordic Pagan culture.</p>
<p align="left">The parallels between Anders Breivik and <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2001-03-29/us/profile.mcveigh_1_timothy-mcveigh-oklahoma-city-bombing-religion-basic-training-fort-bragg?_s=PM:US">Timothy McVeigh</a> (<a href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/oklahoma.htm">Oklahoma City</a> Terrorist) are starting to surface in the most startling way. According to Breivik&#8217;s manifesto he was originally a Liberal Protestant, but later lost his Christian faith, doubted the existence of God, and praised the evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin. McVeigh in comparison, was raised a Roman Catholic, but later lost his Christian faith, believed in an impersonal and naturalistic deity, <a href="http://howcanoneknow.org/blog/2011/07/24/breivik-mcveigh-darwinian-terrorists/">declaring</a> that his «only god is science».</p>
<p align="left">Reading the 1,500 pages manifest of the terrorist, one can understand that Reivik was obsessed with the idea that the political advance of Islam and the multiculturalism of the left have combined to make victims out of traditional European Culture. It is from that overaching framework that many of the rest of his ideas can be understood. On this basis, Reivik Action can be compared to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/05/london_blasts/what_happened/html/">London 7/7</a> attack.</p>
<p align="left">Actually, the roots of the two attack were the same. «The multiculturalism’s celebration – Brendan O’Neill <a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10923">wrote</a> &#8211; of identity over solidarity, its promotion of the politics of self-pity and victimhood, of a perception that minority identities are continually under threat from the post-colonial and xenophobic attitudes of both society’s rulers and its native masses, found its most fanatical expression in the London bombings. In the bombers’ extraordinary levels of self-pity, combined with their arrogant belief that their Muslim identity gave them the right to hector the British throng, we got a glimpse of how far the multicultural ethos can be pushed. Breivik, for all his anti-multicultural pretensions, is not that different».</p>
<p align="left">In conclusion, Breivik is not Christian, and not Catholic, but a member of Freemasonry. The Freemasonry came out even in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/08/phone-hacking-scandal-jonathan-rees">reports about</a>  the <a href="http://www.journalismethics.info/feature_articles/UK_bugging_scandal.htm">bugging scandal</a> in Great Britain, that seriously damaged the media tycoon Rupert Murdoch’s Reputation. There is a even a malicious link that one could do. A link that would bring to a Third World War forecasted by <a href="http://www.threeworldwars.com/dogma.htm">Albert Pike</a>, 33<sup>rd</sup> degree Freemason and author on Masonry, in a letter to the Italian Patriot Giuseppe Mazzini -  33<sup>rd</sup> degree Freemason <a href="http://www.whale.to/b/33.html">as well</a>. After planning the first and second World War – occurred as proposed by Pike – there would be a <a href="http://endrtimes.blogspot.com/2007/06/albert-pikes-letter-to-guisseppe.html">Third World War</a>, «fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the &#8216;agentur&#8217; of the &#8216;Illuminati&#8217; between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion».</p>
<p>Science fiction? Maybe. Actually, the Catholic Church must not face only enemies coming from outside, because the cancer is also inside the Church – as the Pope <a href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/fatima-message-shows-catholic-church-is-attacked-by-internal-sins-pope-declares/">underlined</a> in his visit to Fatima the last year. There is the need &#8211; Benedict XVI also claimed several times &#8211; for a <a href="http://thecurrentpope.com/pope-true-knowledge-of-god-comes-from-inner-purification.html">inner purification</a> of the Church. But the attack from the outside is strong and well structured. And Benedict XVI  in the last <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20101208_xliv-world-day-peace_en.html">message</a> for the World Day of Peace affirmed that Christians are the most persecuted confession in the world, and it is not only because of the massacre of Christians all over the world – e.g. the recent <a href="http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Hindu-radical-kills-Christian-who-had-testified-in-court-in-a-Kandhamal-pogrom-related-case-22233.html">killings</a> of <a href="http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Christian-leaded-found-dead-in-Kandhamal,-Sajan-George-accuses-Hindu-radicals-22228.html">Christians</a> in India. «I also express – the Pope wrote &#8211;  my hope that in the West, and especially in Europe, there will be an end to hostility and prejudice against Christians because they are resolved to orient their lives in a way consistent with the values and principles expressed in the Gospel». The Pope also urged Europe to reconcile to its Christian roots, «which are fundamental for understanding its past, present and future role in history».</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/from-norway-with-hate-why-was-breivik-depicted-as-a-christian-fundamentalist/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
