<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MondayVatican &#187; MondayVatican &#8211; Islam » Communion, witness and religious freedom. The Pope´s message in Lebanon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mondayvatican.com/tag/islam/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com</link>
	<description>Vatican at a Glance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Communion, witness and religious freedom. The Pope´s message in Lebanon</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/communion-witness-and-religious-freedom-the-pope%c2%b4s-message-in-lebanon</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/communion-witness-and-religious-freedom-the-pope%c2%b4s-message-in-lebanon#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesia in Medioriente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interreligious dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Louis Tauran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land of Cedars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papal trip to Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontifical Council for Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontifical Council for interreligious dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regensburg's Lecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wittness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=1155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/papa-libano-baabda.jpeg"></a>Young Muslims were also <a href="http://www.trinityafer.com/en/index.php/news/11035-pope-to-celebrate-open-air-mass-on-beirut-seafront-christians-and-moslems-together">among those</a> who attended the Holy Mass that Benedict XVI gave in the waterfront in Beirut, on Sunday, September 16. And young Muslims <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49045224/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/pope-says-multi-faith-lebanon-should-be-model-middle-east/#.UF9qs7KTvIY">took part</a> in the Pope’s meeting with the Lebanese Youth in Bkerké, one of the many Marian sanctuaries in the Land of Cedars, which is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/papa-libano-baabda.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1156" title="papa libano baabda" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/papa-libano-baabda-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Young Muslims were also <a href="http://www.trinityafer.com/en/index.php/news/11035-pope-to-celebrate-open-air-mass-on-beirut-seafront-christians-and-moslems-together">among those</a> who attended the Holy Mass that Benedict XVI gave in the waterfront in Beirut, on Sunday, September 16. And young Muslims <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49045224/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/pope-says-multi-faith-lebanon-should-be-model-middle-east/#.UF9qs7KTvIY">took part</a> in the Pope’s meeting with the Lebanese Youth in Bkerké, one of the many Marian sanctuaries in the Land of Cedars, which is also known as «<a href="http://www.mariadinazareth.it/www2005/Santuari%20mariani%20nel%20mondo/Nostra%20Signora%20del%20Libano.htm">Mary’s land</a>» because of the Lebanese devotion to the Virgin Mary. Benedict XVI thus also addressed his words to young Muslims. He warmly <a href="http://www.zenit.org/article-35548?l=english">thanked</a> them for their presence. And he mentioned once again the three pillars of all dialogue – not just the dialogue with Islam: truth (sought and explained with reasoned arguments), religious freedom, and protecting life.</p>
<p>That Benedict XVI noted these principles in Lebanon – a land considered an example of religious cohabitation – and that he did at every meeting, without hesitation and without mincing his words, is very significant. It reveals how the relationship with the Islamic world <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/184641?eng=y">has evolved</a> in the recent past. Since the controversial <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-regensburg_en.html">Regensburg’s lecture</a>, an unprecedented dialogue has taken place. Benedict XVI knows very well that it is pointless to argue about the truthfulness of different faiths, and he is not one who would ever water down Christian truth in order to gain some kind of concession from interreligious dialogue. Instead he focused on shared concerns, to which all religions are sensitive to. This approach was evident when – in the very beginning of his Pontificate – Benedict XVI <a href="http://www.catholicculture.org/news/features/index.cfm?recnum=42433">established</a> the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue as a section of the Pontifical Council for Culture. What happened after the Regensburg lecture, and then the visit to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/world/europe/30iht-pope.3732907.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_moc.semityn.www">Blue Mosque</a> in Istanbul during the trip to Turkey in 2007, made the Pope all the more aware that dialogue among religions needed a proper «framework», also in order not to disturb and lose sight of the work of so many who had been engaged in ad hoc arrangements. That is why Benedict XVI revamped the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, and <a href="http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.it/2007/06/tauran-around-city.html">appointed</a> Card. Jean Louis Tauran, a skilled and most senior diplomat, as president of the new dicastery.  According to many, it was he who proofread the Papal speeches in Lebanon. Copies of the final drafts of the Papal speeches are shared in advance with journalists.  Several of these texts were tweaked to fine-tune references to Lebanese freedom, allowing the Pope to convey a clear message without the risk of a diplomatic incident.</p>
<p>Tauran later commented the Papal trip in an interview <a href="http://www.korazym.org/index.php/dialogo-interreligioso/18-islam-ebraismo-ecc/3019-tauran-il-nemico-di-cristiani-e-musulmani-e-lislamismo.html">he gave</a> to the French agency iMedia and to the French weekly <em>La Croix</em>. In the interview, Tauran recalled that «in Lebanon, we did not mention the Syrian crisis. Lebanon and Syria are sovereign countries. For sure, the Pope appealed for peace. The use of armed forces must be stopped, and both sides must sit at a table to negotiate, with the help of the international community. Humanitarian aid must be provided, in order to respect the fundamental rights of the human person. And then, there is the need for both sides to build a society where the rights of everyone are respected, with no discrimination.»</p>
<p>Peace was the key topic of the September, 15 <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2012/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20120915_autorita_en.html">speech</a> the Pope delivered in the presidential palace of Baabda, Lebanon. This speech – Tauran says – was received in an «extremely positive» way by the Muslim leaders and by the Muslim grassroots.  «I have been told – Tauran said – that Muslims responsible for the different districts stated that the Pope said exactly what they hoped to hear.» Not even Tauran expected such an enthusiastic reaction.</p>
<p>A reaction that came about because Benedict XVI spoke to everyone’s heart. He underlined: «If we want peace, let’s defend life». He noted that peace must rise upon the purification of language and memory, and also by an opening to the transcendental. He once again focused on religious freedom, which must not be reduced to mere tolerance and that- because of its social and political dimensions – is indispensible for peace. And he strongly affirmed: «A lived faith leads invariably to love. Authentic faith does not lead to death. The peacemaker is humble and just.»</p>
<p>These words shattered to pieces the building blocks of any fundamentalist approach, and directly appeal to religious freedom. Furthermore, Benedict XVI also spoke of the tactic the devil uses in seeking his allies among men. This has an immediate resonance in the Arab world, where Shai-tan, Satan, is considered the spirit of division.</p>
<p>However, the speech was delivered while Islamist protests were taking place against a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19600542">film about</a> the prophet Mohammad that Muslims consider blasphemous.  The Pope´s speech received scant attention in the U.S. media. It was almost unnoticed, as religious freedom in general seems to have been forgotten. Yet, <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2012/09/21/bishops-religious-freedom-and">religious freedom</a> is one of the main focuses of the U.S. bishops’ agenda.  The Pope has focused his pontificate on religious freedom. He has spoken about religious freedom during his visits to the United States, Latin American countries and to France and other secularized Western countries. Above all, he spoke about religious freedom in Lebanon, in a Middle East where religion seems to mean «contrast». Instead, Benedict XVI put forth in Lebanon two key concepts: communion and witness. These two words were the key of the post-synod exhortation <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_ben-xvi_exh_20120914_ecclesia-in-medio-oriente_en.html"><em>Ecclesia in Medio Oriente</em></a>, which delivery was the main institutional reason for the Papal trip. The news (and the message) was in these two words, which we cannot afford to forget.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/communion-witness-and-religious-freedom-the-pope%c2%b4s-message-in-lebanon/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credo. Toward the Year of Faith. From Paul VI to Benedict XVI</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/credo-toward-the-year-of-faith-from-paul-vi-to-benedict-xvi</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/credo-toward-the-year-of-faith-from-paul-vi-to-benedict-xvi#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amour des lettres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakthrough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caritas in Veritate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Journet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College des Bernardins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Correspondence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credo of the People of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[désir de Dieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dictatorships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch Catechism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enlightenment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fideism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israelites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Maritain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Leclercq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new evangelization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parable of the weeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porta Fidei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prophecy of Fatima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quaerere Deum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationality of faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regensburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renaissance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routine faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Peter and Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search for God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke of Satan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbol of faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbol of Nicea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology of liberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third secret of Fatima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westminster Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year of Faith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/bxvi_presentazione_messale.jpg"></a>«Religious communities as well as parish communities, and all ecclesial bodies old and new, are to find a way, during this Year, to make a public profession of the Credo» Benedict XVI wrote these words in the apostolic letter <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/motu_proprio/documents/hf_ben-xvi_motu-proprio_20111011_porta-fidei_en.html">Porta Fidei</a> for the indiction of the year of Faith.</p> <p>Will there be a <a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/bxvi_presentazione_messale.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-733" title="bxvi_presentazione_messale" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/bxvi_presentazione_messale-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>«Religious communities as well as parish communities, and all ecclesial bodies old and new, are to find a way, during this Year, to make a public profession of the Credo» Benedict XVI wrote these words in the apostolic letter <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/motu_proprio/documents/hf_ben-xvi_motu-proprio_20111011_porta-fidei_en.html"><em>Porta Fidei</em></a> for the indiction of the year of Faith.</p>
<p>Will there be a <a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~mysticalrose/credo.html">Credo of the People of God</a> at the climax of the Year of Faith indicted by Benedict XVI as there was during the year of faith indicted by Paul VI?  - (And some believes there will also be a Papal <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/church/the-pope-in-assisi-reaching-for-the-year-of-faith-and-%E2%80%93-maybe-%E2%80%93-a-new-encyclical">encyclical </a>on Faith).</p>
<p>The Year of Faith indected by Benedict XVI is maybe the most important step of the path of purification and renewal of the Faith brought on by the Pope since the beginning of His pontificate. The &#8220;word orders&#8221; are: <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/church/turning-back-to-god-the-gift-of-benedict-xvi-to-the-church-of-germany-and-to-all-the-church">turning back</a> to God, <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/church/unchain-the-church-the-program-that-benedict-xvi-reinforced-in-germany">turning back</a> to the Faith, turning back to the <a href="http://www.iltempo.it/politica/2011/11/28/1304992-ratzinger_crisi_abbandona.shtml">search for God</a>. And doing it with the weapons of the Reason. This Benedict XVI particularly underlined during his <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/travels/2011/index_germania_en.htm">trip to Germany</a>. He <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2011/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20110925_catholics-freiburg_ge.html">praised</a> the providentiality of secularizing trends. More: he said that «agnostics, who are constantly exercised by the question of God, those who long for a pure heart but suffer on account of our sin, are closer to the Kingdom of God than believers whose life of faith is ‘routine’ and who regard the Church merely as an institution, without letting their hearts be touched by faith». Words that <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/church/the-pope-in-assisi-reaching-for-the-year-of-faith-and-%E2%80%93-maybe-%E2%80%93-a-new-encyclical">he reprised</a> in Assisi.</p>
<p>This was a central <a href="http://rccommentary2.blogspot.com/2011/10/year-of-faith-2-inspired-by-pope-paul.html">topic</a> for Pope Paul VI, who indicted a Year of Faith in 1968, and he concluded it in Saint Peter&#8217;s Square, on June 30, 1968, with the proclamation of a solemn profession of faith, the <em>Credo of the People of God</em>.</p>
<p>How, and why, did Paul VI get the idea to coronate the Year of Faith with the proclamation of the Credo of the People of God? The answer to these two questions is in the sixth volume of the <a href="http://openlibrary.org/books/OL16607568M/Journet_Maritain_correspondance"><em>Correspondence</em></a> between the Swiss theologian and cardinal Charles Journet and the French philosopher Jacques Maritain, the 303 letters that the two exchanged between 1965 and 1973.<br />
It was Maritain who wrote the outline of the Credo of the People of God that Paul VI later recited.</p>
<p>Maritain was 85 years old in 1967, and he had just published <em>Le paysan de la Garonne</em> [The peasant of the Garonne], a criticism of the post-conciliar Church «on its knees before the world».  In a letter, he confides to cardinal Journet an idea:  «The Sovereign Pontiff should draft a complete and detailed profession of faith, in which everything that is really contained in the Symbol of Nicea would be presented explicitly. This will be, in the history of the Church, the profession of faith of Paul VI».  Journet photocopied the philosopher&#8217;s letter and gave it to the pope, when he met with him on January 18. On that occasion, Paul VI asked the theologian for his judgment on the state of the Church&#8217;s health. «Tragic», Journet answered. Both he and the pope were in shock over the publication in Holland &#8211; one year earlier and with the blessing of the bishops &#8211; of a new Catechism aimed at nothing less than «substituting one orthodoxy for another in the Church, a modern orthodoxy for the traditional orthodoxy».</p>
<p>On December 14, Paul VI again met with Cardinal Journet, who told him about Maritain&#8217;s idea. And Paul VI reminded him that others had already suggested, at the end of Vatican Council II, the promulgation of a new symbol of faith. Paul VI <a href="http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/204969">said </a>to Journet: «You two, prepare for me an outline of what you think should be done».</p>
<p>It <a href="http://holyqueen.altervista.org/papa_paolovi_biffi.htm">emerges</a> from the correspondence between the theologian and the philosopher that Maritain intended his text to be simply a guide. But Journet decided to send the text to the pope without adding anything. On April 6, a letter arrived from Rome from the Dominican theologian Benoît Duroux, an adviser for the congregation for the doctrine of the faith. It praised Maritain&#8217;s text and supplied a few comments.</p>
<p>On June 30, 1968, Paul VI solemnly proclaimed the Credo of the People of God in Saint Peter&#8217;s Square. There are few variations compared to the Maritain&#8217;s sketch: in one passage, Maritain had explicitly cited the common witness that the Israelites and Muslims give to the one God, together with Christians; in his Credo, Paul VI gives thanks to the divine goodness for the &#8220;many believers&#8221; who share faith in the one God with Christians, without specifically mentioning Judaism and Islam.</p>
<p>There is much of Paul VI in Benedict XVI. When he still was a cardinal, Joseph Ratzinger <a href="http://www.vatican.va/news_services/or/or_quo/cultura/2010/270q04a1.html">commemorated</a> Pope Montini remembering that «the Pope considered that it was his commitment to defend and put under light the entity of the faith instead of dissolving the message in a simple repetition of ideologies that come and go. In the midst of the confusion of the dictatorships, faith gave a good account of itself for its capacity not to be corrupted: one must obey to God more than to the men. If many classified Pope Montini’s pontificate as contradictory, as part of the unsolved dialectic between  breakthrough and tradition; they so neglect what characterizes the most the pontificate, the interior unity of his action that comes from the immutability and dynamism of the love to Christ».</p>
<p>It is worth to give a look to the worries of Paul VI, the menaces against faith he saw. June, 29<sup>th</sup> 1972, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/homilies/1972/documents/hf_p-vi_hom_19720629_it.html">homily</a> for the Feast of Saint Peter and Paul: «From some fissure the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God. There is doubt, incertitude, problematic, disquiet, dissatisfaction, confrontation.  There is no longer trust of the Church; they trust the first profane prophet who speaks in some journal or some social movement, and they run after him and ask him if he has the formula of true life.  And we are not alert to the fact that we are already the owners and masters of the formula of true life.  Doubt has entered our consciences, and it entered by windows that should have been open to the light.» November, 15<sup>th</sup> 1972, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/audiences/1972/documents/hf_p-vi_aud_19721115_it.html">general audience</a>: «One of the Church&#8217;s greatest needs is to be defended against the evil we call the Devil […] It is a terrible reality, mysterious and frightening. […] It is a departure from the picture provided by biblical Church teaching to refuse to knowledge the Devil&#8217;s existence […]So we know that this dark disturbing being exists and that he is still at work with his treacherous cunning; he is the hidden enemy who sows errors and misfortunes in human history». February, 3<sup>rd</sup> 1977, <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/audiences/1977/documents/hf_p-vi_aud_19770202_it.html">general audience</a>: «Is not it a wonder if the Scripture harshly admonish us that “all the world underlie the power of the Devil?”».</p>
<p>The answer is in <em>quaerere Deum</em>, the search for God that Benedict XVI exalted in the speech <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2008/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20080912_parigi-cultura_en.html">he held</a> at the College des Bernardins in Paris in 2008. The Pope said: «Because [the monks] were Christians, this was not an expedition into a trackless wilderness, a search leading them into total darkness.  God himself had provided signposts, indeed he had marked out a path which was theirs to find and to follow.  This path was his word, which had been disclosed to men in the books of the sacred Scriptures.  Thus, by inner necessity, the search for God demands a culture of the word or – as Jean Leclercq put it: eschatology and grammar are intimately connected with one another in Western monasticism.  The longing for God, the <em>désir de Dieu</em>, includes <em>amour des lettres</em>, love of the word, exploration of all its dimensions».</p>
<p>The scripture is the signpost we should refer to. Let’s make a step backward, to the Pope’s <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-regensburg_en.html">Regensburg address</a> in 2006. «While we rejoice in the new possibilities open to humanity &#8211; the Pope said &#8211; we also see the dangers arising from these possibilities and we must ask ourselves how we can overcome them. We will succeed in doing so only if reason and faith come together in a new way, if we overcome the self-imposed limitation of reason to the empirically falsifiable, and if we once more disclose its vast horizons. In this sense theology rightly belongs in the university and within the wide-ranging dialogue of sciences, not merely as a historical discipline and one of the human sciences, but precisely as theology, as inquiry into the rationality of faith».</p>
<p>Let’s make a step forward, and re-read <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2010/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20100917_societa-civile_en.html">the speech</a> Benedict XVI addressed in 2010 at Westminster Hall to the representatives of British Society. «The inadequacy of pragmatic, short-term solutions to complex social and ethical problems has been illustrated all too clearly by the recent global financial crisis. There is widespread agreement that the lack of a solid ethical foundation for economic activity has contributed to the grave difficulties now being experienced by millions of people throughout the world. Just as “every economic decision has a moral consequence” (<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html#37.">Caritas in Veritate, 37</a>), so too in the political field, the ethical dimension of policy has far-reaching consequences that no government can afford to ignore».</p>
<p>During his pontificate, Benedict XVI worked to alight one by one all the objections moved to the faith. In his speeches, he puts the history of world <a href="http://www.cesnur.org/2010/mi-papa-fatima2.html">under a new light</a>, by facing the main moments of modernity (the Protestant reform, the Enlightenment, the 20<sup>th</sup> century’s ideologies) and analyzing them. Each moment has a part that one can share – the reaction to rationalism of the Renaissance for Luther, the critic to fideism and the re-evaluation of the Reason for the Enlightenment, the wish to face the problems and injustices caused by social and political inheritance of the Enlightenment for the 20<sup>th</sup> century’s ideology – and a part that in some ways denies what good has been done: Luther dismantles the synthesis of faith and reason that gave life to Medieval Christianity; Enlightenment – in order to re-evaluate reason – it radically divides the reason from the Faith, it become laicism and it compromise the integrity of the reason it wanted to save; the 20<sup>th</sup> century’s ideologies – by criticizing the abstract idea of freedom of the Enlightenment &#8211; put in discussion freedom itself.</p>
<p>«First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn». (<a href="http://www.bcbsr.com/survey/pbl6.html">Matthew, 13-29</a>) It is in the words of the parable of the weeds that one can recognize the<em> modus operandi </em>of Benedict XVI. He did so even when he was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (one example: the two documents on the Theology of Liberation, the first one <a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19840806_theology-liberation_en.html"><em>pars destruens</em></a> and the second one <a href="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19860322_freedom-liberation_en.html"><em>pars construens</em></a>). Benedict XVI is conscious that the Church is living a dramatic era, under the <a href="http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1004161.htm">dictatorship</a> of the <a href="http://www.timeslive.co.za/world/2011/08/20/pope-warns-of-false-gods-in-madrid-visit">false Gods</a>, living the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/pope-benedict-xvi-visits-lady-fatima-famed-shrine/story?id=10642089">prophecy</a> of Fatima.</p>
<p>Fatima has had an important role in the Catholic Church ever since the Virgin Mary <a href="http://www.miraclerosarymission.org/fatima.htm">appeared</a> to three poor shepherd children here in 1917. The children said she spoke to them and entrusted them with three prophetic revelations known as the <a href="http://goodnewspirit.com/fatima-secrets.htm">three secrets of Fatima</a>.</p>
<p>The first two secrets were made public early on. But the mysterious &#8220;third secret&#8221; was not revealed until 2000, when it was interpreted to be a prediction of the <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/4/5/160320.shtml">attempted assassination</a> of Pope John Paul II in 1981. Pope Benedict, in a  conversation with reporters, explained in his precise Italian that the interpretation of the third secret does not stop there, however. The third secret &#8211; he said &#8211; has a permanent and ongoing significance. The Pope said its significance could even be extended to include the suffering the Church is going through today as a result of the recent reports of sexual abuse involving the clergy.</p>
<p>«As for the new things which we can find in this message today – the Pope <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2010/may/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20100511_portogallo-interview_en.html">said</a> &#8211; there is also the fact that attacks on the Pope and the Church come not only from without, but the sufferings of the Church come precisely from within the Church, from the sin existing within the Church. This too is something that we have always known, but today we are seeing it in a really terrifying way: that the greatest persecution of the Church comes not from her enemies without, but arises from sin within the Church, and that the Church thus has a deep need to relearn penance, to accept purification, to learn forgiveness on the one hand, but also the need for justice. Forgiveness does not replace justice. In a word, we need to relearn precisely this essential: conversion, prayer, penance and the theological virtues».</p>
<p>In Fatima, Benedict XVI put the Church in penance. The year of Faith will probably be the last step of purification, waiting for a new evangelization of the world, as the Pope wrote in <em>Porta Fidei</em>: «It often happens that Christians are more concerned for the social, cultural and political consequences of their commitment, continuing to think of the faith as a self-evident presupposition for life in society. In reality, not only can this presupposition no longer be taken for granted, but it is often openly denied». The need is to turn back to the Credo, because «confessing with the lips indicates in turn that faith implies public testimony and commitment. A Christian may never think of belief as a private act. Faith is choosing to stand with the Lord so as to live with him. This “standing with him” points towards an understanding of the reasons for believing. Faith, precisely because it is a free act, also demands social responsibility for what one believes».</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/benedict-xvi/credo-toward-the-year-of-faith-from-paul-vi-to-benedict-xvi/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Norway with hate. Why was Breivik depicted as a Christian fundamentalist?</title>
		<link>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/from-norway-with-hate-why-was-breivik-depicted-as-a-christian-fundamentalist</link>
		<comments>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/from-norway-with-hate-why-was-breivik-depicted-as-a-christian-fundamentalist#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Gagliarducci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Pike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Breivik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan O'Neill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card. Kurt Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian fundamentalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemasonry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giuseppe Mazzini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Harald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight TEmplar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lodge St. Olaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London 7/7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luteran Church of Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiculturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Pagan Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norwegian Order of Freemasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timo Soini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy McVeigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Day of Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mondayvatican.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Oslo-Bombing.jpg"></a>Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, <a href="http://www.agi.it/english-version/world/elenco-notizie/201107301419-cro-ren1027-cardinal_koch_takes_papal_solidarity_to_norway">went</a> to an official visit to Norway to take «the solidarity of the Catholic Church and the solidarity of the Holy Father, in particular, to Norway at this tragic time, along with greetings for the great Feast of St Olaf, which was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Oslo-Bombing.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-518" title="Oslo-Bombing" src="http://www.mondayvatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Oslo-Bombing-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, <a href="http://www.agi.it/english-version/world/elenco-notizie/201107301419-cro-ren1027-cardinal_koch_takes_papal_solidarity_to_norway">went</a> to an official visit to Norway to take «the solidarity of the Catholic Church and the solidarity of the Holy Father, in particular, to Norway at this tragic time, along with greetings for the great Feast of St Olaf, which was celebrated yesterday». And the Pope sent a condolences message to the Norway’s King Harald. «At this time of national grief – the Pope <a href="http://www.patheos.com/community/deaconsbench/2011/07/23/quote-of-the-day-the-pope-on-norway/">wrote</a> – I pray that all Norwegians will be spiritually united in a determined resolve to reject the ways of hatred and conflict and to work together fearlessly in shaping a future of mutual respect, solidarity and freedom for coming generations». But after the terroristic attacks to Norway, even the Catholic Church <a href="http://www.getreligion.org/index.php?s=Anders+Behring+Breivik&amp;submit.x=29&amp;submit.y=27">can feel</a> a little more under attack.</p>
<p>Because Anders Reivik – the author of the terror attack in Norway that caused more than 80 death people – has been initially described by the press as <a href="http://www.lhrtimes.com/norwegian-police-officer-gunned-down-at-least-84-people-at-an-island-youth-camp.html">a Christian fundamentalist</a>. Breivik was – according to the first <a href="http://dekerivers.wordpress.com/2011/07/23/anders-behring-breivik-gun-loving-right-wing-christian-kills-at-least-92-people-in-norway-obsession-with-marxists-muslims-norway%E2%80%99s-multicultural-ideals/">reports</a> – a Christian obsessed by the Islamic world and by multiculturalism. It was just like every right-nationalist is more likely to any other to have Christian roots, or like being Christian fundamentalists is the only way to be ferociously anti-islamic.</p>
<p align="left">Recently, this have become a common reading of the facts. In Finland, <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/international-affairs/from-finland-with-love-is-catholic-thought-going-to-be-a-minority-to-protect">Timo Soini</a>, a Christian nationalist, had been accused of xenophobia. In Hungary, the new <a href="http://presidentialactivism.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/full-english-text-of-the-new-hungarian-constitution/">Constitution</a> has been founded on Christian roots, and had been <a href="http://www.mondayvatican.com/church/christianity-is-there-a-future-after-secularization">accused </a>of homophobia, xenophobia and backwardness. In the Usa, David Limbaugh <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/10/2/102405.shtml">highlighted</a> how the two most powerful molders of opinion in the nation, the media and Hollywood, are at the head of the line in the war on Christianity, frequently ridiculing and disparaging Christians in ways they would never dream of employing against any other group of Americans. David Limbaugh writes:  «This anti-Christian bias manifests itself in unflattering portrayals of Christians in Hollywood films and entertainment television, and also in the demonization of Christian conservatives in the media». And there are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith/post/norway-attacks-when-christianity-becomes-lethal/2011/07/25/gIQAPRw5YI_blog.html">academics</a> who are sharpening their swords and taking the usual swings at orthodox forms of religion.</p>
<p align="left">Whatever comes out about Ander Breivik, one thing is certain. He is far more complex than a common «Christian Fundamentalist». He was a Freemason and a Knight Templar, and <a href="http://www.bestgore.com/murder/anders-behring-breivik-video-manifesto-knights-templar-freemason/">immensely proud</a> to be it. The average Christian Fundamentalist is usually anti-Masonic, while Protestant Fundamentalists generally regard Freemasonry as occult and Pagan in nature, in essence very anti-Christian. The Catholic Church forbids all its members from becoming Freemasons <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_Freemasonry">under pain</a> of excommunication. The Protestant Fundamentalist position is – on the other hand &#8211; absolute and militant, by claiming that «Christians cannot be masons». Given the general position of Christian Fundamentalists on this issue, and given the fact that Breivik listed Freemasonry as an «interest» on his Facebook page up to the day of the massacre, it is virtually impossible for him to truly be a «Christian Fundamentalist».</p>
<p>In fact, Breivik was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Franklin1776/reminders-that-norwegian-_n_910097_99451768.html">baptized</a> into the state-run liberal Protestant Church (Lutheran Church of Norway), but later became disillusioned with the way in which Liberal Protestantism has sacrificed much of its historic Christian character. He once <a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/norway-killings-arrested-fundamentalist-christian-reveals-hatred-of-modern-church-in-blogs-52745/">blogged</a>: «Today&#8217;s Protestant church is a joke. Priests in jeans who march for Palestine and churches that look like minimalist shopping centres. I am a supporter of an indirect collective conversion of the Protestant church back to the Catholic». Breivik (a political Zionist) obviously had little knowledge of Catholicism, for if he did, he would have known that one of the biggest Christian supporters of a Palestinian State is none other than the Catholic Church.</p>
<p>But he was baptized «by his own free will» – as he said – probably in order to be accepted into the Norwegian Order of Freemasons (Norwegian: Den Norske Frimurerorden), is the Masonic Grand Lodge in Norway. The first lodge (St. Olai Lodge – Later changed to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Order_of_Freemasons">Lodge St. Olaus</a> to the white Leopard) was opened in 1749 and is still working. The Grand Lodge has followed the Swedish Rite since 1818, which requires its members to adhere to Christianity. During the union of Sweden-Norway, the Swedish-Norwegian king was Grand Master of the Order. The sovereign Grand Lodge of Norway was consecrated in 1891. As of 2009, the Order has about 20,000 members.</p>
<p align="left">In light of his membership in the Masonic Lodge however, Breivik could not be a Catholic, for that would require breaking membership with the Lodge prior to reception into the Catholic Church. More likely, Breivik was lamenting the loss of historic Christian culture, which according to his <a href="http://canspeccy.blogspot.com/2011/07/breiviks-manifesto.html">manifesto</a> he saw on par with historic Nordic Pagan culture.</p>
<p align="left">The parallels between Anders Breivik and <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2001-03-29/us/profile.mcveigh_1_timothy-mcveigh-oklahoma-city-bombing-religion-basic-training-fort-bragg?_s=PM:US">Timothy McVeigh</a> (<a href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/oklahoma.htm">Oklahoma City</a> Terrorist) are starting to surface in the most startling way. According to Breivik&#8217;s manifesto he was originally a Liberal Protestant, but later lost his Christian faith, doubted the existence of God, and praised the evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin. McVeigh in comparison, was raised a Roman Catholic, but later lost his Christian faith, believed in an impersonal and naturalistic deity, <a href="http://howcanoneknow.org/blog/2011/07/24/breivik-mcveigh-darwinian-terrorists/">declaring</a> that his «only god is science».</p>
<p align="left">Reading the 1,500 pages manifest of the terrorist, one can understand that Reivik was obsessed with the idea that the political advance of Islam and the multiculturalism of the left have combined to make victims out of traditional European Culture. It is from that overaching framework that many of the rest of his ideas can be understood. On this basis, Reivik Action can be compared to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/05/london_blasts/what_happened/html/">London 7/7</a> attack.</p>
<p align="left">Actually, the roots of the two attack were the same. «The multiculturalism’s celebration – Brendan O’Neill <a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10923">wrote</a> &#8211; of identity over solidarity, its promotion of the politics of self-pity and victimhood, of a perception that minority identities are continually under threat from the post-colonial and xenophobic attitudes of both society’s rulers and its native masses, found its most fanatical expression in the London bombings. In the bombers’ extraordinary levels of self-pity, combined with their arrogant belief that their Muslim identity gave them the right to hector the British throng, we got a glimpse of how far the multicultural ethos can be pushed. Breivik, for all his anti-multicultural pretensions, is not that different».</p>
<p align="left">In conclusion, Breivik is not Christian, and not Catholic, but a member of Freemasonry. The Freemasonry came out even in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/08/phone-hacking-scandal-jonathan-rees">reports about</a>  the <a href="http://www.journalismethics.info/feature_articles/UK_bugging_scandal.htm">bugging scandal</a> in Great Britain, that seriously damaged the media tycoon Rupert Murdoch’s Reputation. There is a even a malicious link that one could do. A link that would bring to a Third World War forecasted by <a href="http://www.threeworldwars.com/dogma.htm">Albert Pike</a>, 33<sup>rd</sup> degree Freemason and author on Masonry, in a letter to the Italian Patriot Giuseppe Mazzini -  33<sup>rd</sup> degree Freemason <a href="http://www.whale.to/b/33.html">as well</a>. After planning the first and second World War – occurred as proposed by Pike – there would be a <a href="http://endrtimes.blogspot.com/2007/06/albert-pikes-letter-to-guisseppe.html">Third World War</a>, «fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the &#8216;agentur&#8217; of the &#8216;Illuminati&#8217; between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion».</p>
<p>Science fiction? Maybe. Actually, the Catholic Church must not face only enemies coming from outside, because the cancer is also inside the Church – as the Pope <a href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/fatima-message-shows-catholic-church-is-attacked-by-internal-sins-pope-declares/">underlined</a> in his visit to Fatima the last year. There is the need &#8211; Benedict XVI also claimed several times &#8211; for a <a href="http://thecurrentpope.com/pope-true-knowledge-of-god-comes-from-inner-purification.html">inner purification</a> of the Church. But the attack from the outside is strong and well structured. And Benedict XVI  in the last <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20101208_xliv-world-day-peace_en.html">message</a> for the World Day of Peace affirmed that Christians are the most persecuted confession in the world, and it is not only because of the massacre of Christians all over the world – e.g. the recent <a href="http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Hindu-radical-kills-Christian-who-had-testified-in-court-in-a-Kandhamal-pogrom-related-case-22233.html">killings</a> of <a href="http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Christian-leaded-found-dead-in-Kandhamal,-Sajan-George-accuses-Hindu-radicals-22228.html">Christians</a> in India. «I also express – the Pope wrote &#8211;  my hope that in the West, and especially in Europe, there will be an end to hostility and prejudice against Christians because they are resolved to orient their lives in a way consistent with the values and principles expressed in the Gospel». The Pope also urged Europe to reconcile to its Christian roots, «which are fundamental for understanding its past, present and future role in history».</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.mondayvatican.com/holy-see/from-norway-with-hate-why-was-breivik-depicted-as-a-christian-fundamentalist/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
